The belief that human beings have moral responsibility is used to judge people based on their actions, then to reward or punish them accordingly. But is this just? This question becomes unavoidable when the theory of determinism enters the discussion. Determinists claim that every event or occurrence in the world, including human desires, thoughts, and acts, are predetermined by physical laws of cause and effect. In such a world there is no space for free will, since any person’s action at any time could not have been different, if all the physical conditions causing it remain the same. As there is no human free will, say the determinists, there can be no moral responsibility either. At the other end of the axis stand libertarians who also view the two phenomena as incompatible, yet the theory they reject is determinism, as they believe that humans do possess free will. Therefore, assigning moral responsibility is justifiable according to their view. In-between these two positions are the compatibilists, who claim that determinism and moral responsibility are not mutually exclusive after all. Different compatibilists explain this with different arguments. In this article, I will only examine one such argument, made by Peter Strawson in his seminal paper ‘Freedom and Resentment’ (Proceedings of the British Academy, Volume 48, 1962), with the purpose of seeing whether it does resolve the centuries old puzzle.
Strawson’s Argument
この記事は Philosophy Now の December 2023 / January 2024 版に掲載されています。
7 日間の Magzter GOLD 無料トライアルを開始して、何千もの厳選されたプレミアム ストーリー、8,500 以上の雑誌や新聞にアクセスしてください。
すでに購読者です ? サインイン
この記事は Philosophy Now の December 2023 / January 2024 版に掲載されています。
7 日間の Magzter GOLD 無料トライアルを開始して、何千もの厳選されたプレミアム ストーリー、8,500 以上の雑誌や新聞にアクセスしてください。
すでに購読者です? サインイン
Who's Watching Who?
Grant Bartley tells a terrifying tale of privacy, paranoia and popular culture.
M.M. Bakhtin (1895-1975)
Vladimir Makovtsev asks: M.M. Bakhtin, philosopher or philologist?
Kant & Love
Ivan lyer has a beautiful Kantian understanding of love.
Kant the (P)Russian Philosopher?
Robert R. Clewis considers present implications of Kant’s Russian connections.
What You Need to Read Before You Read Kant
22nd April 2024 is the 300th birthday of Immanuel Kant.
The Healing of Philosophy
John Clark, MD, says our worship of the intellect has become pathological.
When to Hold Your Friends' Feet to the Fire
Jordan Myers argues, against Christine Korsgaard, that we shouldn't always hold our friends morally responsible.
How to Be an Antiracist Consequentialist
Nathaniel Goldberg and Chris Gavaler consider lbram X. Kendi’s requirements for being antiracist.
Shakespeare: Folly, Humanism & Critical Theory
Sam Gilchrist Hall! surveys folly and wisdom in Shakespeare's world and beyond.
Don Quixote & Narrative Identity
Inés Pereira Rodrigues asks, are we always or ever) who we Say we are?