Tehelka - February 28 2017

في هذه القضية

1: Present budget is nothing but plagiarism of policies
Finance Minister Arun Jaitley came out with the announcements that had nothing much for general public as the government weakly imitated the entire social sector programs of the Manmohan Singh-led UPA government. p 14-15
2: How safe is it to invest in MLM-based firms?
Social media exchange companies such as Webwork and Social Trade, who were luring investors with promising payment schemes, are now facing backlash from its members and RBI, reports Tehelka Bureau (p-24-25)
3: No word on unsung heroes amid politics of jingoism
Decades later, when humiliating adversaries has become a norm, a few election candidates are towing the same line and seeking vote in the name of patriotism. P-66

Budget 2017-2018 New Or Old?

While some say it is plagiarism of earlier policies, others find it strategically safe. A few others call it an ‘uncharitable’ move.

5 mins

Uncharitable it may be called

Withdrawing the benefits of tax exemption for donations to charitable and religious institutions under Secton 80G of the Act will directly hurt their functioning writes MY SIDDIQUI.

4 mins

Cyber Robberies Expose Our Sordid Underbelly

While the government is pressing for cashless transaction, more people are becoming victims of cyber robberies amid weak encryption policies and slack cyber security measures taken by the general public, writes SANJIB SINHA.

7 mins

TN Politics Reopen Debate On Governors' Powers

Amid chaos surrounding Jayalalithaa’s death, Sasikala’s jail, expulsion of Panneerselvam from party and EK Palanisamy being named new party chief, the role of governor remains a bit obscure.

5 mins

قراءة كل الأخبار من Tehelka

Tehelka Magazine Description:

Tehelka has invested heavily in hard hitting investigative reporting and has pushed the boundaries of editorial content further than most…" says BBC.
"Tehelka is a delightful Urdu word, difficult to translate. It refers to that special kind of tumult provoked by a daring act, or a sensational piece of writing. And Tehelka has certainly lived up to its name…" Time On January 31, 2004.
After more than two years of persecution, Tehelka was reborn as a weekly newspaper committed to constructive, crusading journalism. As a people's paper geared to take a stand, to follow the hard investigative story. A fearless paper ready to create opinion, and not just remain a passive vehicle of news. Over the years, Tehelka has firmly established itself as a people’s media choice. With public interest journalism, serious opinion and analysis, Tehelka has earned unmatched credibility and brand recall. It has very quickly established an enviable reputation — national and international — for the quality of its reportage, the eminence of its writers, and the refinement of its analyses and ideas. As a premium English weekly, Tehelka, increasingly, influences almost every opinion leader and decision maker in the country. Tehelka, earlier in a tabloid size, is now in a weekly magazine format. The magazine format only means a more compact and elegant design — the core values of public interest journalism and literary writing remain unchanged. Tehelka, India’s fastest growing English language weekly, in its new format is poised for a dramatic up scaling of visibility and readership. This follows repeated demand by readers to switch to a magazine format, since the contents of Tehelka are seen to have much more shelf value and depth than a newspaper. This format with its easy size allows for longevity and high pass along readership, a necessary attribute given the depth and quality of writing in Tehelka. For ardent readers, the switch to a magazine has enhanced the positive values already inherent in Tehelka. The new look Tehelka may be smaller in format but is much bigger in impact. Also brighter, crisper, more unputdownable. In the seven years since it was born, Tehelka has stood the test. Its courage under fire is well-known. But most importantly, it has brought back into hard focus the two most crucial pillars of a free press: public interest and the appetite to question