The double debate

The virtues of double bridles versus snaffles at international grand prix level has divided opinion in the dressage world. Alice Collins examines the issue and finds out why feelings are strong on both sides of the argument

- MICHAEL ELIBERG

I wasn't long ago that the idea of safety helmets in top-level FEI dressage sent lovers of the top hat into a tailspin. They've since become the norm. Now, a proposal by the freshly formed Equine Ethics and Wellbeing Commission to the FEI to consider permitting the use of snaffle bridles at all levels is the hot topic.

Double bridles are currently mandatory at international grand prix level. But why? And should tradition trump all?

One rider who has recently changed his mind on the matter is Michael Eilberg.

"I can see why people could think that the double, with all its heritage, fits the picture that we traditionally expect to see of a grand prix combination, but we used to think that about the top hat, too," he reasons. "Now, our eye has changed and someone in a helmet doesn't spoil the overall picture at all. I think it will be the same for snaffles in the end."

But the pull of tradition is strong, argues Irish team rider Dane Rawlins.

"At home everyone can ride in what they like, but in international dressage at high levels there is a standard to meet and achieve and I believe it's well set by riding correctly and lightly into the fine control of a double bridle," he insists. "They're a fantastic set of bits if used properly. If you can't ride in one, don't ride at top level."

So far, the International Dressage Riders Club (IDRC) and International Dressage Trainers Club (IDTC) agree with Dane.

Their response to the proposal stated: "The opposition to the double bridle comes from a lack of understanding regarding how and why the double bridle is used. Yes, the misuse of the double bridle can lead to force and injury but this is true with the snaffle or any other bit or even a hackamore.