This could happen to you in the Indian state of Uttarakhand. Under Section 378 of the Uttarakhand Uniform Civil Code, those who are in a live-in relationship are required to register it with the authorities. The Code has received the president's assent and the state government says it will implement it as soon as possible.
Two questions arise: one about the content of the law and one about how it will be enforced. One of the substantive law questions is that of privacy and the requirement to register a live-in. This is especially relevant after the Puttaswamy opinion of the Supreme Court of India, which held privacy was a constituent of the fundamental right to life and liberty. Even if it is held that the state has the right to demand this information from citizens, the Code falters when it comes to basic procedural requirements.
The Code seems to ignore a foundational precept of administrative law - the rule of law. Rule of law is the opposite of the rule of the prince, meaning citizens should be governed by properly formulated laws rather than the whims of officials. In its most basic form, it stipulates that a person can only be held liable for actions which are a distinct breach of law and that public officials will always be guided by powers granted to them by law. Legal philosopher Joseph Raz, a proponent of legal positivism which does not see a necessary link between law and morality argues that a citizen must be able to plan their lives and to do so they must know the sphere of freedom. For that, it is imperative to understand the coercive limits of state action in a particular circumstance.
BACKGROUND
هذه القصة مأخوذة من طبعة September 04, 2024 من The Business Guardian.
ابدأ النسخة التجريبية المجانية من Magzter GOLD لمدة 7 أيام للوصول إلى آلاف القصص المتميزة المنسقة وأكثر من 9,000 مجلة وصحيفة.
بالفعل مشترك ? تسجيل الدخول
هذه القصة مأخوذة من طبعة September 04, 2024 من The Business Guardian.
ابدأ النسخة التجريبية المجانية من Magzter GOLD لمدة 7 أيام للوصول إلى آلاف القصص المتميزة المنسقة وأكثر من 9,000 مجلة وصحيفة.
بالفعل مشترك? تسجيل الدخول
Odisha startup launches autonomous drone service
Bon V Aero has launched a fully autonomous logistics drone service called Air Orca.
ITI Ltd gets orders worth Rs 4,559 cr
With this, ITI Limited has emerged as the lowest bidder for three packages taking the total order value to Rs 4,559 crores, the company informed stock exchanges in a filing on Sunday.
Trump presidency set to benefit India due to US-China rivalry: Moody's Ratings
Trump's trade policy approach would likely bring immediate impacts to the manufacturing sector, the Moody's Ratings said, adding that although a divided Congress might slow down or adjust the scope of such measures.
EPFO clears audit Backlog, pushes reforms ahead of 72nd Foundation Day
Labour Secretary and Chairperson of Executive Committee, Central Board, Employees' Provident Fund Organization (EPFO), Sumita Dawra, presided over the 109th Meeting of the Executive Committee this week in the national capital.
Biz as usual in Canada despite tensions between New Delhi, Ottawa: SBI
State Bank of India (SBI) has not seen any impact in Canada despite the ongoing tensions between New Delhi and Ottawa, a top bank official has said.
FMCG brands drive premiumisation amid inflation
Despite persistent inflation and sluggish demand, several leading FMCG and retail brands are doubling down on their premiumization strategies, reshaping their approach to appeal to discerning customers.
Supreme Court Issued Notice To Delhi Tree Authority And Officers: What Procedure Followed In Tree Felling?
The Supreme Court in the case MC Mehta versus The Union Of India And Ors observed and has issued notice to the Tree Authority and the Tree Officers who are being appointed under the Delhi Preservation of Trees Act, 1994, in a petition filed seeking to prevent the Delhi government in order to permit tree felling under the Act without prior permission from the court.
SC: LIS PENDENS DOCTRINE KICKS IN WHEN PETITION IS FILED AND NOT WHEN COURT ISSUED NOTICE; IT APPLIES EVEN IF PETITION WAS IN DEFECT
The bench comprising of Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, Justice JB Pardiwala and Justice Manoj Misra was hearing the present matter.
Delhi High Court: Cannot Approve MCD Not Paying Wages, Retiral Benefits To Its Employees; If They Default Must Suffer Interest
The Delhi High Court in the case Municipal Corporation of Delhi Versus Bijender Singh observed and has stated that it can never be an approver to the Municipal Corporation of Delhi, MCD for not paying wages or retiral benefits to its employees.
Delhi High Court To Centre: Take Policy Decision On Guidelines For Foreigners With Criminal Cases And Expired Indian Visas
The Delhi High Court in the case Court On Its Own Motion v State observed and has asked the Union Government to take a policy decision as to whether certain guidelines ought to be framed at national level in respect of foreigners against whom criminal cases are lodged and whose Indian visas have expired.
