Israel's ban on URWA: A strategic gamble

Israel's recent prohibition of URWA (Universal Right to Work and Access), a framework providing vulnerable populations with access to essential services and employment, has ignited international concern.

- PROF. (DR.) NISHAKANT OJHA

This policy, framed as a security measure, represents a troubling divergence from internationally upheld human rights norms and is likely to have far-reaching consequences.

URWA's mission is to uphold human rights by facilitating access to critical resources such as employment, healthcare, and education, particularly in areas with significant economic disparities.

Its programs are a lifeline for communities affected by conflict, especially in places like Gaza and the West Bank, where socio-economic conditions are severely strained.

Israel's rationale for the ban appears to be security-focused, with the argument that limiting URWA's activities will help mitigate threats.

However, critics counter that the restriction will likely increase tensions by depriving marginalized populations of essential resources.

Denying access to jobs, healthcare, and education has historically proven to worsen security risks by deepening poverty, frustration, and hopelessness.

The ban on URWA raises substantial concerns under international law, as it may conflict with multiple human rights agreements:

Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR): Adopted in 1948, the UDHR asserts that individuals have a right to work, secure a livelihood, and access social protections.

Israel's prohibition of URWA programs denies these basic rights to Palestinians, which is inconsistent with its obligations as a United Nations member.

International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights (ICESCR): Ratified by over 170 nations, this covenant guarantees the right to dignified employment, fair wages, and a sustainable living standard.

By banning URWA, Israel is impeding these rights for Palestinians, raising questions about its adherence to this covenant.