MBS' ban on ex-top executive sparks debate over persona non grata notices

The unprecedented use of a persona non grata notice by Marina Bay Sands to ban a former top casino executive from the entire integrated resort over alleged high-roller and staff poaching has raised questions about the legality and fairness of such notices.

- Grace Leong

Legal experts told The Straits Times that such a move is highly unusual, and while it does not contravene the Casino Control Act, the sweeping ban has sparked debate over whether it is too wide-ranging and whether the integrated resort is entitled to ban people from quasi-public spaces within its premises.

A quasi-public property refers to a space that is privately owned but open to public access. This could include shopping malls and lobbies of hotels and office buildings.

The Straits Times had reported on Aug 28 that Resorts World Sentosa (RWS) chief casino officer Andrew MacDonald and another RWS executive, Ms Louise Ng, were each issued persona non grata notices prohibiting them “from entering or remaining on any part of Marina Bay Sands integrated resort premises".

The ban, which took effect on July 31, would mean both executives would not be able to enter areas “including but not limited to the hotel, mall, convention centre and casino".

MBS has not stated publicly why the two are no longer welcome, but media reports said the notices were issued over concerns that Mr MacDonald might have been attempting to poach MBS customers and staff during several visits to the property in July 2024.

Mr MacDonald, who was with MBS for nearly 12 years before joining RWS, has denied the allegations.

It is not uncommon for casinos to issue persona non grata (or unwelcome person) notices to unruly people.