CONTROVERSY RAGES IN CARNATIC MUSIC AS TRADITIONS AND POLITICAL BELIEFS CLASH

The world of classical music is often revered for its ability to transcend boundaries, evoke emotions, and unite diverse communities through the power of melody. However, it is not immune to controversy, as demonstrated by the recent uproar surrounding the Sangita Kalanidhi Award bestowed upon renowned Carnatic vocalist T.M. Krishna.

- ATHA SRINIVASAN

In the realm of Indian classical music, the Sangita Kalanidhi Award, presented by the Music Academy in Chennai, is considered one of the highest honours. It recognises individuals who have made significant contributions to the field of Carnatic music, celebrating their mastery of the art form and their dedication to its preservation and propagation. Traditionally, the award has been a symbol of excellence and integrity, representing the highest standards of musicianship and cultural heritage.

Thodur Madabusi Krishna aka T.M. Krishna, a celebrated vocalist known for his innovative approach to Carnatic music was chosen as the recipient of the Sangita Kalanidhi Award in 2024. His selection for the award this year has created outrage among many Carnatic musicians and Carnatic music lovers.

WHY THE CONTROVERSY

The controversy surrounding Krishna’s award stems from a combination of factors, including his unconventional interpretations of traditional compositions, his criticism of established norms within the Carnatic music community, and his vocal support for causes that challenge the status quo. Some critics argue that Krishna’s approach undermines the sanctity of Carnatic music by deviating from established traditions and introducing elements that are perceived as “secular” or politically charged. His calls for greater inclusivity and representation from non-Brahminical communities have sparked heated debates within the music fraternity, exposing deep-seated caste and class tensions and ideological differences.