I Don't Believe It!
Philosophy Now|February/March 2021
Dene Bebbington presents a couple of bad but popular arguments.
Dene Bebbington
I Don't Believe It!

How often have you read or heard someone say something like “That’s not possible, it couldn’t have happened like that”? That person may think it’s a clever rebuttal which stops debate in its tracks and gives them the rhetorical victory, but it’s a fallacy in informal logic known as the argument from personal incredulity.

Humans have a need for certainty – we have a psychological preference against doubt – which is why this fallacy has a particular allure. To understand what’s going on when someone has committed this fallacy, we can unpack its unstated logic:

1. I can’t imagine how this thing could be true

2. But if this thing is true then I should be able to imagine how it’s true

3. Therefore this thing is not true

Once the premises of the argument, 1 and 2, are laid bare, its flaw is exposed. The premise that ‘If this thing is true then I should be able to imagine how it’s true’ is evidently false, or at least, is not necessarily true.

Diese Geschichte stammt aus der February/March 2021-Ausgabe von Philosophy Now.

Starten Sie Ihre 7-tägige kostenlose Testversion von Magzter GOLD, um auf Tausende kuratierte Premium-Storys sowie über 8.000 Zeitschriften und Zeitungen zuzugreifen.

Diese Geschichte stammt aus der February/March 2021-Ausgabe von Philosophy Now.

Starten Sie Ihre 7-tägige kostenlose Testversion von Magzter GOLD, um auf Tausende kuratierte Premium-Storys sowie über 8.000 Zeitschriften und Zeitungen zuzugreifen.

WEITERE ARTIKEL AUS PHILOSOPHY NOWAlle anzeigen
The Two Dennises
Philosophy Now

The Two Dennises

Hannah Mortimer observes a close encounter of the same kind.

time-read
3 Minuten  |
June/July 2024
Heraclitus (c.500 BC)
Philosophy Now

Heraclitus (c.500 BC)

Harry Keith lets flow a stream of ideas about permanence and change.

time-read
6 Minuten  |
June/July 2024
Does the Cosmos Have a Purpose?
Philosophy Now

Does the Cosmos Have a Purpose?

Raymond Tallis argues intently against universal intention.

time-read
7 Minuten  |
June/July 2024
Is Driving Fossil-Fuelled Cars Immoral?
Philosophy Now

Is Driving Fossil-Fuelled Cars Immoral?

Rufus Duits asks when we can justify driving our carbon contributors.

time-read
10+ Minuten  |
June/July 2024
Abelard & Carneades Yes & No
Philosophy Now

Abelard & Carneades Yes & No

Frank Breslin says 'yes and no' to presenting both sides of an argument.

time-read
6 Minuten  |
June/July 2024
Frankl & Sartre in Search of Meaning
Philosophy Now

Frankl & Sartre in Search of Meaning

Georgia Arkell compares logotherapy and atheistic existentialism.

time-read
7 Minuten  |
June/July 2024
Luce Irigaray
Philosophy Now

Luce Irigaray

Luce Irigaray, now ninety-two years old, was, among many other things, one of the most impactful feminists of the 1970s liberation movements - before she was marginalised, then ostracised, from the francophone intellectual sphere.

time-read
10+ Minuten  |
June/July 2024
Significance
Philosophy Now

Significance

Ruben David Azevedo tells us why, in a limitless universe, we’re not insignificant.

time-read
6 Minuten  |
June/July 2024
The Present Is Not All There Is To Happiness
Philosophy Now

The Present Is Not All There Is To Happiness

Rob Glacier says don’t just live in the now.

time-read
10+ Minuten  |
June/July 2024
Philosophers Exploring The Good Life
Philosophy Now

Philosophers Exploring The Good Life

Jim Mepham quests with philosophers to discover what makes a life good.

time-read
7 Minuten  |
June/July 2024