The Nightmare Before Christmas
Philosophy Now|December 2020 / January 2021
Siobhain Lash argues that you can sometimes be to blame even when you couldn’t have done differently.
Siobhain Lash
The Nightmare Before Christmas

If free will does not exist, what implications does this have for our ethical behavior, specifically for moral responsibility? And what does determinism – the idea that you could not have done otherwise than what you actually did – really imply for moral responsibility?

The widely-held Principle of Alternate Possibilities states that a person is morally responsible for what he has done only if he could have done otherwise. Thus if someone is said to have a level of control over their actions and a choice between two options – to do or to not do something – then they can be considered as morally responsible for their actions. Conversely, if they lack a real ability to choose between two options (for instance because determinism is true) then they cannot be considered as morally responsible for their actions. This includes if a person was being influenced by external or internal force. For instance, if I hold a gun to your head and tell you to open the bank vault, you are not morally responsible for doing so.

Diese Geschichte stammt aus der December 2020 / January 2021-Ausgabe von Philosophy Now.

Starten Sie Ihre 7-tägige kostenlose Testversion von Magzter GOLD, um auf Tausende kuratierte Premium-Storys sowie über 8.000 Zeitschriften und Zeitungen zuzugreifen.

Diese Geschichte stammt aus der December 2020 / January 2021-Ausgabe von Philosophy Now.

Starten Sie Ihre 7-tägige kostenlose Testversion von Magzter GOLD, um auf Tausende kuratierte Premium-Storys sowie über 8.000 Zeitschriften und Zeitungen zuzugreifen.

WEITERE ARTIKEL AUS PHILOSOPHY NOWAlle anzeigen
The Two Dennises
Philosophy Now

The Two Dennises

Hannah Mortimer observes a close encounter of the same kind.

time-read
3 Minuten  |
June/July 2024
Heraclitus (c.500 BC)
Philosophy Now

Heraclitus (c.500 BC)

Harry Keith lets flow a stream of ideas about permanence and change.

time-read
6 Minuten  |
June/July 2024
Does the Cosmos Have a Purpose?
Philosophy Now

Does the Cosmos Have a Purpose?

Raymond Tallis argues intently against universal intention.

time-read
7 Minuten  |
June/July 2024
Is Driving Fossil-Fuelled Cars Immoral?
Philosophy Now

Is Driving Fossil-Fuelled Cars Immoral?

Rufus Duits asks when we can justify driving our carbon contributors.

time-read
10+ Minuten  |
June/July 2024
Abelard & Carneades Yes & No
Philosophy Now

Abelard & Carneades Yes & No

Frank Breslin says 'yes and no' to presenting both sides of an argument.

time-read
6 Minuten  |
June/July 2024
Frankl & Sartre in Search of Meaning
Philosophy Now

Frankl & Sartre in Search of Meaning

Georgia Arkell compares logotherapy and atheistic existentialism.

time-read
7 Minuten  |
June/July 2024
Luce Irigaray
Philosophy Now

Luce Irigaray

Luce Irigaray, now ninety-two years old, was, among many other things, one of the most impactful feminists of the 1970s liberation movements - before she was marginalised, then ostracised, from the francophone intellectual sphere.

time-read
10+ Minuten  |
June/July 2024
Significance
Philosophy Now

Significance

Ruben David Azevedo tells us why, in a limitless universe, we’re not insignificant.

time-read
6 Minuten  |
June/July 2024
The Present Is Not All There Is To Happiness
Philosophy Now

The Present Is Not All There Is To Happiness

Rob Glacier says don’t just live in the now.

time-read
10+ Minuten  |
June/July 2024
Philosophers Exploring The Good Life
Philosophy Now

Philosophers Exploring The Good Life

Jim Mepham quests with philosophers to discover what makes a life good.

time-read
7 Minuten  |
June/July 2024