When any public company announces a new CEO, the board braces itself for investors’ reactions as they manifest in decreases or increases in share price. Investors are a highly salient stakeholder group whose responses to the appointment of chief executives, especially racial minorities, are highly anticipated and undoubtedly influence who is selected. But how much should their prospective reactions matter when a board is leaning toward selecting a Black candidate for the CEO role?
The issue is urgent. Despite noteworthy progress toward racial equity in some industries and at some job levels, Black representation in corporate America’s top leadership positions remains woefully low: The number of Black Fortune 500 CEOs peaked in 2023 — at nine. That is less than 1 in 50 for a racioethnic group that accounts for more than 1 in 8 Americans.
Recent research findings have highlighted how investors’ biases and perceptions influence their reactions to the appointment of Black CEOs. However, different groups of scholars have offered two highly divergent perspectives. One is pessimistic, suggesting that racial discrimination in American society pervades investors, thereby precipitating a negative stock market reaction to Black CEO appointments. The other, more optimistic view reflects positive market reactions when investors recognize the extensive and valuable human and social capital accrued by Black CEOs — individuals who overcame various hurdles to become senior executives.
Diese Geschichte stammt aus der Spring 2024-Ausgabe von MIT Sloan Management Review.
Starten Sie Ihre 7-tägige kostenlose Testversion von Magzter GOLD, um auf Tausende kuratierte Premium-Storys sowie über 8.000 Zeitschriften und Zeitungen zuzugreifen.
Bereits Abonnent ? Anmelden
Diese Geschichte stammt aus der Spring 2024-Ausgabe von MIT Sloan Management Review.
Starten Sie Ihre 7-tägige kostenlose Testversion von Magzter GOLD, um auf Tausende kuratierte Premium-Storys sowie über 8.000 Zeitschriften und Zeitungen zuzugreifen.
Bereits Abonnent? Anmelden
Avoiding Harm in Technology Innovation
To capitalize on emerging technologies while mitigating unanticipated consequences, innovation managers need to establish a systematic review process.
Make a Stronger Business Case for Sustainability
When greener products and processes add costs, managers can shift other levers to maintain profitability.
How to Turn Professional Services Into Products
Product-based business models can help services firms achieve greater scale and profitability. But the transformation can be challenging.
Do You Really Need a Chief AI Officer?
The right answer depends on the strategic importance and maturity of AI in your company.
Where To Next? Opportunity on the Edge
Doing business in regions considered less stable or developed can pay off for companies. But they must invest in working with local communities.
Make Smarter Investments in Resilient Supply Chains
Many companies invest in resilience only after a disruption. Applying the concept of real options can help decision makers fortify supply chain capabilities no matter the crisis.
The Three Traps That Stymie Reinvention
Organizational identity, architecture, and collaboration can be either assets or liabilities to pursuing growth in new sectors.
What Makes Companies Do the Right Thing?
Vaccine makers varied widely in their engagement with global public health efforts to broaden access to COVID-19 immunizations. Ethically motivated leadership was a dominant factor.
Build the Right C-Suite Team for Your Strategy
CEOs can foster a more effective leadership team by understanding when to tap senior executives' competitive instincts and when to encourage collaboration.
A Better Way to Unlock Innovation and Drive Change
A strengths-based approach to building teams can win employee commitment to change and foster an inclusive, agile culture.
