MPs debate deadly jabs

Maria Caulfield (Under Secretary of State at the Department of Health and Social Care) herself admitted that 'no vaccine is 100 per cent safe'

- EILIS JORDAN

ON Thursday April 18, Andrew Bridgen stood up in the House of Commons and delivered an historic speech to open the long-awaited debate on the response to excess deaths following covid-19 and the response.

There were just 16 MPs present. Whatever you think of Bridgen, he gave a damning account of the effects of the covid jabs, and the packed public gallery erupted into spontaneous and thunderous applause after his speech and were swiftly told off by the Speaker of the House for doing so.

I was there, and it was a momentous occasion. It wasn't only Andrew Bridgen's speech that was damning. There were many nuggets of truth revealed, to which there was very little meaningful response. And this excellent 2.5-hour debate is now all on the public record (see link below).

For a start, it was deemed 'beyond doubt that the covid vaccine has caused deaths and other serious injuries. This is evidenced by the fact that the government's own compensation scheme for vaccine damage injuries has paid the maximum compensation possible (£120,000) to 163 people for serious, life-changing injuries after the covid vax.

And the scheme is far behind in assessing vax claims. There have been more than 9,000 claims so far.

Another damning fact is there have been more than 480,000 reports of adverse effects from the covid jab on the MHRA's Yellow Card reporting system since it was introduced in 2021 (including fatalities) more than all reports for all other vaccines combined in the previous 20 years.