THE RIGHT TO EDUCATION ACT: FROM POLICY TO REALITY
That understanding finally took the form of the Right to Education (RTE) Act, 2009, passed for India, mandating free and compulsory education to children between ages 6 and 14 years. The RTE Act was regarded as a revolutionary step toward ensuring inclusive and equitable quality education for all. Over a decade since its implementation, there is a huge gap between the policy promises and harsh realities on the ground.
This write-up aims to explore the objectives of the RTE Act, the challenges that impede its effective implementation, and potential strategies to bridge the gap between policy and practice.
OBJECTIVES OF THE RIGHT TO EDUCATION ACT
The RTE Act was essentially born out of Article 21A of the Indian Constitution, guaranteeing every child's right to free and compulsory education. The Act seeks to provide universal access to education with the aim that every child should acquire good quality education irrespective of their socio-economic background. It achieves the mentioned objective in several key provisions.
Compulsory Registration and Attendance: Under the RTE Act, every child in the age group of 6-14 years is registered and assured attendance in school. In other words, the responsibility of doing so rests with the state.
Infrastructural and Qualification Standards for Teachers in Schools: Minimum standards in terms of school infrastructure, students per teacher, and qualifications of teachers must be assured. The requirement is aimed at raising the quality of education throughout the country.
No Detention Policy: The Act bars detention or expulsion of children from schools until they complete elementary education; it leaves no stone unturned to ensure that a child learns without a fear of failure.
Diese Geschichte stammt aus der October 26, 2024-Ausgabe von The Business Guardian.
Starten Sie Ihre 7-tägige kostenlose Testversion von Magzter GOLD, um auf Tausende kuratierte Premium-Storys sowie über 8.000 Zeitschriften und Zeitungen zuzugreifen.
Bereits Abonnent ? Anmelden
Diese Geschichte stammt aus der October 26, 2024-Ausgabe von The Business Guardian.
Starten Sie Ihre 7-tägige kostenlose Testversion von Magzter GOLD, um auf Tausende kuratierte Premium-Storys sowie über 8.000 Zeitschriften und Zeitungen zuzugreifen.
Bereits Abonnent? Anmelden
CM Atishi approves 'Anywhere Registration' policy
Delhi residents will now be able to register their property at any sub-registrar office of their choice, at their convenience.
Delhi government is doing politics of malice," says BJP
BJP MP Bansuri Swaraj hit out at the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) government in Delhi and former Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal over the Ayushman Bharat row and said that the Delhi government is doing politics of malice.
Kejriwal slams Ayushman Bharat as a 'scam'
Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) National Convenor Arvind Kejriwal on Wednesday asserted that Delhi's health model is superior to the Ayushman Bharat scheme, urging Prime Minister Narendra Modi to consider adopting it nationwide, calling Ayushman Bharat a \"major scam.\"
Motorists penalised Rs 47 cr for pollution certificate violations
Amid a rise in air pollution levels in the national capital, the traffic police have imposed penalties to the tune of Rs 47 crore on motorists between October 1 and 24 for pollution certificate violations, an official said on Wednesday.
No Hindu-Muslim angle to ban on firecrackers in Delhi: Kejriwal
Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) convener Arvind Kejriwal on Wednesday defended ban on firecrackers, saying it is necessary for protecting people from pollution and there is no ‘Hindu-Muslim’ angle to it
DELHI'S AIR QUALITY PLUMMETS TO 'VERY POOR' ON DIWALI EVE: POLLUTION LEVELS LIKELY TO RISE FURTHER
Delhi's air quality slipped into the \"very poor\" category on the eve of Diwali, with pollution levels expected to go up on Thursday, even as authorities said strict action will be taken against those violating the firecracker ban
SC: Shouting And Threatening Someone Does Not Amount To Assault | Section 353 IPC
The Supreme Court in the case K. Dhananjay Versus Cabinet Secretary And Ors. observed that shouting and threatening someone does not amount to committing an offence of assault.
Delhi High Court: Two Adjudication Order Against One Show Cause Notice For The Same Period Is Not Permissible
The Delhi High Court in the case M/s Jain Cement Udyog (Through Its Proprietor Sh. Sanjay Jain) v. Sales Tax Officer Class-II observed and has stated that two adjudication orders against one show cause notice for the same period is not permissible.
Calcutta High Court On Plea To Curb Animal Sacrifice: Religious Practices In east India Differ From Those In North India, Cannot Be Restricted
The Calcutta High Court vacation bench in the case observed and has remarked that since religious practices in East India differ from those in North India, it would not be realistic to call for a restriction of practices which may have formed an 'essential religious practice' for many communities.
Delhi High Court On PIL To Grant Admission To Rohingya Refugee Children: 'Matter Involves International Issues, Policy Decision To Be Taken By Centre'
The Delhi High Court in the case Social Jurist, A Civil Rights Group versus Municipal Corporation of Delhi And Anr observed and has refused to entertain a public interest litigation, PIL filed seeking directions to the Delhi government and the Municipal Corporation of Delhi to grant admission to Rohingya refugee children in local schools.