The bench comprising of Justice Surya Kant and Justice P.S. Narasimha in the case emphasized the duty of the Consolidation Officer as it is stated under the 1953 Act stating that the duty of a Consolidation Officer under Section 49 of the 1953 Act is to prevent fragmentation and consolidate the different parcels of land of a tenure holder and not to take away the vested title of a tenure holder as no such power is being conferred upon a Consolidation Officer to take away the vested title of a tenure holder.
The Judgement authored by Justice Surya Kant stated that the power as stated under Section 49 of the 1953 Act cannot be exercised to take away the vested title of a tenure holder and no such jurisdiction is conferred upon a Consolidation Officer or any other Authority under the 1953 Act.
It has been stated under section 49 of the 1953 Act that it contemplates a bar to the jurisdiction of the Civil or Revenue Court for the grant of declaration or adjudication of rights of tenure holders in respect of land lying in an area for which consolidation proceedings have commenced before the court.
Further, the court clarified that the section 49 of the 1953 Act is a provision of transitory suspension of jurisdiction of Civil or Revenue Court only during the period when consolidation proceedings are pending.
Adding to it, the court stated that suspension of jurisdiction of these Courts through the non-obstante provision is only with regards to the declaration and adjudication of rights of tenure holders.
Diese Geschichte stammt aus der May 10, 2024-Ausgabe von The Business Guardian.
Starten Sie Ihre 7-tägige kostenlose Testversion von Magzter GOLD, um auf Tausende kuratierte Premium-Storys sowie über 8.000 Zeitschriften und Zeitungen zuzugreifen.
Bereits Abonnent ? Anmelden
Diese Geschichte stammt aus der May 10, 2024-Ausgabe von The Business Guardian.
Starten Sie Ihre 7-tägige kostenlose Testversion von Magzter GOLD, um auf Tausende kuratierte Premium-Storys sowie über 8.000 Zeitschriften und Zeitungen zuzugreifen.
Bereits Abonnent? Anmelden
Odisha startup launches autonomous drone service
Bon V Aero has launched a fully autonomous logistics drone service called Air Orca.
ITI Ltd gets orders worth Rs 4,559 cr
With this, ITI Limited has emerged as the lowest bidder for three packages taking the total order value to Rs 4,559 crores, the company informed stock exchanges in a filing on Sunday.
Trump presidency set to benefit India due to US-China rivalry: Moody's Ratings
Trump's trade policy approach would likely bring immediate impacts to the manufacturing sector, the Moody's Ratings said, adding that although a divided Congress might slow down or adjust the scope of such measures.
EPFO clears audit Backlog, pushes reforms ahead of 72nd Foundation Day
Labour Secretary and Chairperson of Executive Committee, Central Board, Employees' Provident Fund Organization (EPFO), Sumita Dawra, presided over the 109th Meeting of the Executive Committee this week in the national capital.
Biz as usual in Canada despite tensions between New Delhi, Ottawa: SBI
State Bank of India (SBI) has not seen any impact in Canada despite the ongoing tensions between New Delhi and Ottawa, a top bank official has said.
FMCG brands drive premiumisation amid inflation
Despite persistent inflation and sluggish demand, several leading FMCG and retail brands are doubling down on their premiumization strategies, reshaping their approach to appeal to discerning customers.
Supreme Court Issued Notice To Delhi Tree Authority And Officers: What Procedure Followed In Tree Felling?
The Supreme Court in the case MC Mehta versus The Union Of India And Ors observed and has issued notice to the Tree Authority and the Tree Officers who are being appointed under the Delhi Preservation of Trees Act, 1994, in a petition filed seeking to prevent the Delhi government in order to permit tree felling under the Act without prior permission from the court.
SC: LIS PENDENS DOCTRINE KICKS IN WHEN PETITION IS FILED AND NOT WHEN COURT ISSUED NOTICE; IT APPLIES EVEN IF PETITION WAS IN DEFECT
The bench comprising of Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, Justice JB Pardiwala and Justice Manoj Misra was hearing the present matter.
Delhi High Court: Cannot Approve MCD Not Paying Wages, Retiral Benefits To Its Employees; If They Default Must Suffer Interest
The Delhi High Court in the case Municipal Corporation of Delhi Versus Bijender Singh observed and has stated that it can never be an approver to the Municipal Corporation of Delhi, MCD for not paying wages or retiral benefits to its employees.
Delhi High Court To Centre: Take Policy Decision On Guidelines For Foreigners With Criminal Cases And Expired Indian Visas
The Delhi High Court in the case Court On Its Own Motion v State observed and has asked the Union Government to take a policy decision as to whether certain guidelines ought to be framed at national level in respect of foreigners against whom criminal cases are lodged and whose Indian visas have expired.
