ProbarGOLD- Free

Hume's Problem of Induction

Philosophy Now|February/March 2024
Patrick Brissey exposes a major unprovable assumption at the core of science.
- Patrick Brissey 
Hume's Problem of Induction

Will the sun rise tomorrow? The answer seems simple: an emphatic “Yes!” But how do you know? We can imagine the following commonsense response: “Well, every morning, the sun rises; atleast from my perspective. Wait until tomorrow; you’ll see!” The reasoning is that, based on past observations, we know that the sun will more than likely rise in the morning. Notice that this conclusion is not certain: the argument is not a purely logical deduction. There are, after all unlikely science fiction scenarios where the sun is suddenly destroyed. These scenarios show that the claim the sun will rise in the morning is possibly false. Despite this, there seems to be a very good probability that it will rise.

In his Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding (1748), David Hume (1711-1776) asserts that even this argument is not good. Hume thinks the skeptical answer – ‘We Don’t Know!’ – is the logical response to this sort of inductive (past-experience-based) argument. For him, we ought to withhold belief on inductive assertions about the future, even over such likely questions as whether the sun will rise in the morning. But perhaps this does not seem right to you: We all know that the sun will rise in the morning, don’t we?

Let’s see how Hume gets to his conclusion.

The ‘Future Will Resemble the Past’ Principle

Imagine someone playing a game of pool. She hits the cue ball, and it collides with the eight ball. What should happen next?

Based on past experience, one would think that the eight ball will travel in a straight line away from the cue ball until impeded by another object. But this is only one hypothesis. Consider the following alternative hypotheses:

Esta historia es de la edición February/March 2024 de Philosophy Now.

Comience su prueba gratuita de Magzter GOLD de 7 días para acceder a miles de historias premium seleccionadas y a más de 9,500 revistas y periódicos.

Esta historia es de la edición February/March 2024 de Philosophy Now.

Comience su prueba gratuita de Magzter GOLD de 7 días para acceder a miles de historias premium seleccionadas y a más de 9,500 revistas y periódicos.

MÁS HISTORIAS DE PHILOSOPHY NOWVer todo
Affirmative Action for Androids
Philosophy Now

Affirmative Action for Androids

Jimmy Alfonso Licon asks, when should we prioritise android rights?

time-read
10+ minutos  |
June/July 2025
Welcome to the Civilization of the Liar's Paradox
Philosophy Now

Welcome to the Civilization of the Liar's Paradox

Slavoj Žižek uncovers political paradoxes of lying.

time-read
10+ minutos  |
June/July 2025
The Importance of the Purple
Philosophy Now

The Importance of the Purple

Massimo Pigliucci looks for threads of integrity in a morally compromised world.

time-read
3 minutos  |
June/July 2025
Ethics for the Age of AI
Philosophy Now

Ethics for the Age of AI

Mahmoud Khatami asks, can machines make good moral decisions?

time-read
10 minutos  |
June/July 2025
Anand Vaidya (1976-2024)
Philosophy Now

Anand Vaidya (1976-2024)

Manjula Menon on the short but full career of a 'disciplinary trespasser'.

time-read
7 minutos  |
June/July 2025
Studying Smarter with AI?
Philosophy Now

Studying Smarter with AI?

Max Gottschlich on sense and nonsense when using AI in academia.

time-read
5 minutos  |
June/July 2025
Excusing God
Philosophy Now

Excusing God

Raymond Tallis highlights the problem of evil.

time-read
7 minutos  |
June/July 2025
Stephen Fry
Philosophy Now

Stephen Fry

Perhaps unshockingly for someone who is an actor, broadcaster, comedian, director, narrator and writer, Stephen Fry has a deep interest in words and how we use them. After hearing him lecture on that subject, Marcel Steinbauer-Lewis asked him about Artificial Intelligence and how it connects with the extraordinary lure of language.

time-read
8 minutos  |
June/July 2025
Is VR Meaningful Escapism?
Philosophy Now

Is VR Meaningful Escapism?

Amir Haj-Bolouri enquires into possible meaning through technology.

time-read
9 minutos  |
June/July 2025
What Simone de Beauvoir Got — And Didn't Get – About Motherhood
Philosophy Now

What Simone de Beauvoir Got — And Didn't Get – About Motherhood

Nura Hossainzadeh argues that motherhood is both physical and transcendent.

time-read
10+ minutos  |
June/July 2025

Usamos cookies para proporcionar y mejorar nuestros servicios. Al usan nuestro sitio aceptas el uso de cookies. Learn more