What's Stopping Us Achieving Artificial General Intelligence?
Philosophy Now|April/May 2023
A. Efimov, D. Dubrovsky, and F. Matveev explore how the development of Al is limited by the perceived need to understand language and be embodied.
A. Efimov, D. Dubrovsky, and F. Matveev
What's Stopping Us Achieving Artificial General Intelligence?

Over seventy years ago, Alan Turing developed the simple but powerful idea that any solvable mathematical problem can in principle be solved with a ‘universal computing device’. The type of device he described in his 1936 paper became known to researchers as a ‘Turing machine’. Ever since we have been trying to create artificial intelligence by programming electronic machines. Most of the current research in the field of AI is indeed just an acceleration of that first universal Turing machine. Turing is also responsible for another fundamental idea that has shaped research in this area. The Turing test makes us ask: if we cannot distinguish whether we are holding a dialogue with a person or a machine, then does it really matter what is in front of us – a machine or a human – since we’re dealing with intelligence anyway?

The Merriam-Webster Dictionary defines intelligence as ‘the ability to learn or understand or to deal with new or trying situations’. Turing’s idea of using language as a tool for comparing machine and human intelligence, based on how well a machine can pretend to be human, is both simple and profound. Thanks to this idea, such wonderful things as voice assistants and online translators have come to life.

Esta historia es de la edición April/May 2023 de Philosophy Now.

Comience su prueba gratuita de Magzter GOLD de 7 días para acceder a miles de historias premium seleccionadas y a más de 9,000 revistas y periódicos.

Esta historia es de la edición April/May 2023 de Philosophy Now.

Comience su prueba gratuita de Magzter GOLD de 7 días para acceder a miles de historias premium seleccionadas y a más de 9,000 revistas y periódicos.

MÁS HISTORIAS DE PHILOSOPHY NOWVer todo
The Two Dennises
Philosophy Now

The Two Dennises

Hannah Mortimer observes a close encounter of the same kind.

time-read
3 minutos  |
June/July 2024
Heraclitus (c.500 BC)
Philosophy Now

Heraclitus (c.500 BC)

Harry Keith lets flow a stream of ideas about permanence and change.

time-read
6 minutos  |
June/July 2024
Does the Cosmos Have a Purpose?
Philosophy Now

Does the Cosmos Have a Purpose?

Raymond Tallis argues intently against universal intention.

time-read
7 minutos  |
June/July 2024
Is Driving Fossil-Fuelled Cars Immoral?
Philosophy Now

Is Driving Fossil-Fuelled Cars Immoral?

Rufus Duits asks when we can justify driving our carbon contributors.

time-read
10+ minutos  |
June/July 2024
Abelard & Carneades Yes & No
Philosophy Now

Abelard & Carneades Yes & No

Frank Breslin says 'yes and no' to presenting both sides of an argument.

time-read
6 minutos  |
June/July 2024
Frankl & Sartre in Search of Meaning
Philosophy Now

Frankl & Sartre in Search of Meaning

Georgia Arkell compares logotherapy and atheistic existentialism.

time-read
7 minutos  |
June/July 2024
Luce Irigaray
Philosophy Now

Luce Irigaray

Luce Irigaray, now ninety-two years old, was, among many other things, one of the most impactful feminists of the 1970s liberation movements - before she was marginalised, then ostracised, from the francophone intellectual sphere.

time-read
10+ minutos  |
June/July 2024
Significance
Philosophy Now

Significance

Ruben David Azevedo tells us why, in a limitless universe, we’re not insignificant.

time-read
6 minutos  |
June/July 2024
The Present Is Not All There Is To Happiness
Philosophy Now

The Present Is Not All There Is To Happiness

Rob Glacier says don’t just live in the now.

time-read
10+ minutos  |
June/July 2024
Philosophers Exploring The Good Life
Philosophy Now

Philosophers Exploring The Good Life

Jim Mepham quests with philosophers to discover what makes a life good.

time-read
7 minutos  |
June/July 2024