The petition claims the dargah was originally a Shiva temple, sparking debates over historical and religious identities in India. The court, on November 25, issued notices to the Ajmer Dargah Committee, the Ministry of Minority Affairs, and the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI), marking the beginning of what could become a prolonged legal battle. The case, now under judicial scrutiny, reflects the delicate balance between historical narratives, legal frameworks, and communal harmony.
WHY COURT ISSUED THE ORDER?
In a fresh controversy amidst ongoing temple-mosque debates in India, a new case has emerged from Rajasthan's Ajmer. Vishnu Gupta, the National President of the Hindu Sena, has filed a petition in court claiming that the historic Ajmer Sharif Dargah is, in fact, a Mahadev (Shiva) temple. Acting on the petition, the court has issued notices to the involved parties, bringing the matter into the spotlight.
Vishnu Gupta has based his petition on historical references, particularly citing the 1911 book Ajmer: Historical and Descriptive by former judge Harbilas Sarda. According to the book, the dargah was allegedly constructed using remnants of a temple. It also claims the presence of a gurbhagriha (sanctum sanctorum) and a Jain temple in the dargah's vicinity. Further, the book mentions the existence of an underground chamber within the dargah containing a Shioling. It is suggested that the temple was originally built by the descendants of Prithviraj Chauhan, the famed ruler of Ajmer.
Gupta has requested that the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) conduct a detailed survey of the site to verify these claims. He also seeks the restoration of Hindu worship rights at the site. During a media interaction, Gupta stated, "We want Ajmer Sharif Dargah to be officially recognized as Sankat Mochan Mahadev Temple. Any existing registration ofthe dargah should be cancelled, and Hindus should be allowed to perform rituals and worship there."
Esta historia es de la edición November 29, 2024 de The Business Guardian.
Comience su prueba gratuita de Magzter GOLD de 7 días para acceder a miles de historias premium seleccionadas y a más de 9,000 revistas y periódicos.
Ya eres suscriptor ? Conectar
Esta historia es de la edición November 29, 2024 de The Business Guardian.
Comience su prueba gratuita de Magzter GOLD de 7 días para acceder a miles de historias premium seleccionadas y a más de 9,000 revistas y periódicos.
Ya eres suscriptor? Conectar
A HOUSE FOR CM: ATISHI ALLEGES CENTRE CANCELS ALLOTMENT AGAIN
Atishi vows to continue working for Delhi despite being removed from her official residence
'A liar has been CM for a decade': BJP attacks Kejriwal
The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has intensified its campaigning for the Delhi assembly polls 2025 as the Election Commission will shortly announce the polls for the National Capital.
CEC: Budget should have no 'Delhi-specific' announcement
Election Commissioner Rajiv Kumar on Tuesday said that the poll body will issue an instruction to the Cabinet Secretary that there should be no Delhi-specific announcement in the Union budget.
AAP plans to spend Rs 5 cr on paid workers," alleges Dikshit
Congress leader Sandeep Dikshit on Tuesday levelled serious allegations against the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) ahead of the upcoming assembly polls in Delhi.
Will AAP hit right notes with 'Phir Lavenge Kejriwal'?
The Aam Admi Party on Tuesday launched its 2025 election campaign, releasing a campaign song dubbed as, 'Phir layenge Kejriwal' (Will bring back Kejriwal). The Election Commission is set to announce dates for the 2025 Delhi assembly polls on Tuesday.
Atishi making false claim of residence being snatched: BJP
The BJP on Tuesday termed as lies Delhi Chief Minister Atishi's claim that her official residence was snatched away and said the allotment of 6, Flagstaff Road, house was withdrawn for two key reasons, which included her failure to take its possession within the required timeframe.
Fight Should Be Against BJP, Says Raut Amid AAP-Cong Poll Tussle
\"This is not right. The level at which the fight between AAP and Congress is going on, the public is watching it.\"
High Court To Haryana Govt: Give Timeline To Establish 'Elderly Helpline' Wherever Not Provided
The Punjab and Haryana High Court in the case Rampal Malhotra v. UOI & Ors observed and has asked the Haryana Government to provide a timeline pertaining to establishment of elderly helpline under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 and Haryana Maintenance of Parents and Senior Citizen Rules, 2009.
DELHI HIGH COURT REJECTED PLEA CHALLENGING CAT 2024 RESULTS
The Delhi High Court in the case Aditya Kumar Mallick vs Union of India and Anr. observed and has dismissed the petition filed challenging the results of Common Admission Test, CAT 2024 for admissions in top management institutes.
Karnataka Government Moves Supreme Court Against Bail Granted To Actor Darshan In Renukaswamy Murder Case
The petition is filed by Advocate Anil C Nishani on behalf of the Karnataka Government.