The bench comprising of Justice G. S. Kulkarni and Justice Jitendra Jain in the case observed and has stated that once the amounts is deposited by the petitioner and it is being retained by the department without the authority of law, the claim of the petitioner for refund could not have been denied. It was appropriate for the petitioner to invoke the jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, wherein it prayed for a writ for the refund of money illegally retained or withheld.
In the present case, the petitioner or assessee challenged the actions of the department or respondent with regards to the amount of Rs. 56,19,84,075, which was contended by the petitioner to be without any authority in law and that no tax is leviable or is to be payable by the petitioner.
Esta historia es de la edición December 02, 2023 de The Business Guardian.
Comience su prueba gratuita de Magzter GOLD de 7 días para acceder a miles de historias premium seleccionadas y a más de 9,000 revistas y periódicos.
Ya eres suscriptor ? Conectar
Esta historia es de la edición December 02, 2023 de The Business Guardian.
Comience su prueba gratuita de Magzter GOLD de 7 días para acceder a miles de historias premium seleccionadas y a más de 9,000 revistas y periódicos.
Ya eres suscriptor? Conectar
ATISHI TAKES CHARGE AS DELHI'S CM, KEEPS ONE EMPTY CHAIR FOR KEJRIWAL
Atishi expressed confidence in Kejriwal's return as CM, criticizing BJP's attempts to tarnish his image through OW imprisonment.
2020 defamation case filed by BJP leader against Kejriwal, Atishi proceeds
The Rouse Avenue court on Monday listed the defamation case filed against Delhi CM Atishi Marlena, former CM Arvind Kejriwal and others for consideration of arguments on charge.
Gang of auto thieves involved in stealing of high-end vehicles busted
Delhi police have busted a gang of auto lifters which was involved in stealing of high end vehicles in the national capital, it said Monday.
Rau's IAS CEO, coordinator granted interim bail
Earlier, the Delhi High Court had asked the CBI to submit a status report addressing the primary causes of waterlogging in the area and the rainfall data from that day.
Attack on turban during clash at DU's Khalsa College, FIR filed
Two groups of students clashed at Delhi University's Khalsa College, during which a student's turban fell off.
DELHI HIGH COURT: FLIPKART'S 'LATCHING-ON' FEATURE CANNOT BE USED TO SELL COUNTERFEIT PRODUCTS OR MISLEAD GULLIBLE PUBLIC
The court in the case observed that sale of the products by the two individual defendants by passing off their products as those emanating from \"Maharaja\" brand on Flipkart cannot be allowed. The court stated that, the feature of latching-on cannot be used to either sell counterfeit products, or to mislead the gullible public into purchasing products, as emanating from a particular source, when they do not so originate from the said source.
The Supreme Court in the case Suresh Khanderao Chavhanke vs.
The Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanam Trust And Other was hearing the petition filed in wake of controversy regarding the alleged use of adulterated ghee in preparing the laddus at the Tirumala Tirupati Temple.
Delhi Government To Supreme Court: Remission Pleas Stalled Due To Ex-CM Arvind Kejriwal's Incarceration Can Be Processed Now
Earlier, it has been informed by the Delhi Government to the Court that the processing of remission pleas had been stalled because the then CM Kejriwal was unable to sign the necessary files due to his incarceration.
Supreme Court Stays NGT Order Directing Punjab Government To Pay 1,026 Crores For Failure To Treat Sewage Waste
The Supreme Court in the case State of Punjab v.Union of India, UOI observed and has stayed the order of the National Green Tribunal, NGT, wherein the court directed the state of Punjab to pay 1,026 Crores to the Central Pollution Control Board as environment compensation for failure to manage legacy waste and untreated sewage.
Supreme Court Set Aside Order Dismissing FIR Quashing Petition As 'Infructuous' Due To Petitioner's Arrest
The Supreme Court in the case Vidhu Gupta v.State of UP observed and has criticized a decision of the Allahabad High Court, which declared a petition seeking the quashing of an FIR as 'infructuous' solely because the petitioner had been arrested.