The Court in the case observed and has held that the High Court ought not to grant extraordinary relief to a petitioner who approaches the writ court belatedly or in other words sleeps over his rights for a considerable period of time.
The court reserved the findings of the High Court, wherein the court allowed the writ petition despite there being an unexplained delay in preferring the writ petition.
The bench comprising of Justice P.S. Narasimha and Justice Aravind Kumar in the case observed the factor of delay and laches which need to be borne in mind by the High Court's while exercising their extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
The judgement authored by the bench of Justice Aravind Kumar stated that this court is of the considered view that writ petitioner ought to have been non-suited or in other words writ petition ought to have been dismissed which being on the ground of delay and laches itself. Thus, the said court has held that delay defeats equity. The delay or laches is one of the factors which should be borne in mind by the High Court while exercising discretionary powers as it is stated under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
The High Court in the said case may refuse to invoke its extraordinary powers if laxity on the part of the applicant to assert his right has allowed the cause of action to drift away and attempts are made subsequently to rekindle the lapsed cause of action.
Esta historia es de la edición April 23, 2024 de The Business Guardian.
Comience su prueba gratuita de Magzter GOLD de 7 días para acceder a miles de historias premium seleccionadas y a más de 9,000 revistas y periódicos.
Ya eres suscriptor ? Conectar
Esta historia es de la edición April 23, 2024 de The Business Guardian.
Comience su prueba gratuita de Magzter GOLD de 7 días para acceder a miles de historias premium seleccionadas y a más de 9,000 revistas y periódicos.
Ya eres suscriptor? Conectar
ATISHI TAKES CHARGE AS DELHI'S CM, KEEPS ONE EMPTY CHAIR FOR KEJRIWAL
Atishi expressed confidence in Kejriwal's return as CM, criticizing BJP's attempts to tarnish his image through OW imprisonment.
2020 defamation case filed by BJP leader against Kejriwal, Atishi proceeds
The Rouse Avenue court on Monday listed the defamation case filed against Delhi CM Atishi Marlena, former CM Arvind Kejriwal and others for consideration of arguments on charge.
Gang of auto thieves involved in stealing of high-end vehicles busted
Delhi police have busted a gang of auto lifters which was involved in stealing of high end vehicles in the national capital, it said Monday.
Rau's IAS CEO, coordinator granted interim bail
Earlier, the Delhi High Court had asked the CBI to submit a status report addressing the primary causes of waterlogging in the area and the rainfall data from that day.
Attack on turban during clash at DU's Khalsa College, FIR filed
Two groups of students clashed at Delhi University's Khalsa College, during which a student's turban fell off.
DELHI HIGH COURT: FLIPKART'S 'LATCHING-ON' FEATURE CANNOT BE USED TO SELL COUNTERFEIT PRODUCTS OR MISLEAD GULLIBLE PUBLIC
The court in the case observed that sale of the products by the two individual defendants by passing off their products as those emanating from \"Maharaja\" brand on Flipkart cannot be allowed. The court stated that, the feature of latching-on cannot be used to either sell counterfeit products, or to mislead the gullible public into purchasing products, as emanating from a particular source, when they do not so originate from the said source.
The Supreme Court in the case Suresh Khanderao Chavhanke vs.
The Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanam Trust And Other was hearing the petition filed in wake of controversy regarding the alleged use of adulterated ghee in preparing the laddus at the Tirumala Tirupati Temple.
Delhi Government To Supreme Court: Remission Pleas Stalled Due To Ex-CM Arvind Kejriwal's Incarceration Can Be Processed Now
Earlier, it has been informed by the Delhi Government to the Court that the processing of remission pleas had been stalled because the then CM Kejriwal was unable to sign the necessary files due to his incarceration.
Supreme Court Stays NGT Order Directing Punjab Government To Pay 1,026 Crores For Failure To Treat Sewage Waste
The Supreme Court in the case State of Punjab v.Union of India, UOI observed and has stayed the order of the National Green Tribunal, NGT, wherein the court directed the state of Punjab to pay 1,026 Crores to the Central Pollution Control Board as environment compensation for failure to manage legacy waste and untreated sewage.
Supreme Court Set Aside Order Dismissing FIR Quashing Petition As 'Infructuous' Due To Petitioner's Arrest
The Supreme Court in the case Vidhu Gupta v.State of UP observed and has criticized a decision of the Allahabad High Court, which declared a petition seeking the quashing of an FIR as 'infructuous' solely because the petitioner had been arrested.