"NON-FREE PROGRAMS Are A Threat To EVERYONE'S FREEDOM"

Richard Matthew Stallman (aka RMS) can be best described as a genius or a maverick. He graduated from Harvard in physics while working at the Artificial Intelligence Lab in Massachusetts Institute of Technology. In 1984, he started developing the GNU operating system, then in 1985 he founded the Free Software Foundation and invented the concept of copyleft-a legal mechanism to protect the modification and redistribution rights of free software. How have things progressed? How happy is he with the current state of affairs? Given the increased awareness and use of free software, we had (wrongly) assumed that he would be happy with the progress. He not only reiterated the weakness in defence of freedom but also outlined the threat humanity faces when "progress" (in the purely practical sense) is promoted at the neglect of freedom. Let's see what he has to say the neglect of freedom. Let's see what he has to say

For the benefit of our readers, who are new to the concept, what exactly is 'free' software?

It's best described by the phrase, "Free as in Freedom, and not Free as in Free Beer." So, when I talk about free software (aka Swatantra software), I am not referring to the cost of the software but to the level of freedom it provides to the user.

How satisfied are you with the progress in the free software world?

We are moving towards horrible tyranny. People are being pressurised to use devices having non-free software for their day-today activities. And non-free software is malware. We have listed over 500 examples on gnu.org/malware.

If a company has control over the software you are using, then it is almost sure to use that control to mistreat you. However, it is possible to refuse, as I do that myself.

I refuse to have a portable phone as every portable phone is a tracking device, which can be modified into a listening device. These so-called smartphones I call them 'snoop' phones-invite you to talk to various online services or 'disservices.' But in the process, they snoop on you terribly; they can manipulate and pressurise you. It's not an acceptable kind of technology.

How do you define malware?

Malware is software designed to mistreat, harm, or annoy the user. Users might be expected to stop this abuse if they could control what the software does.

Do you consider marketing messages as malware?

Yes, because most users tend to turn those off in the settings. Software taking user permissions during installation is a racket. Users often don't understand what a program will actually do. But also in many cases, the choice is, either give permission for the program to do all these things, or it doesn't work at all.

How is then the choice of users determined?