Dr Hutch

At what point does a bold show of strength become brazen showboating? The Doc ponders the etiquette of the long solo break

The men's side of the Classics this season was dominated by two riders and one tactic. The riders were Tadej Pogačar and Mathieu van der Poel, and the tactic was the boringly long solo break.

Don't misunderstand me - I'm still very impressed by both of them. We're talking about two of the most effective riders the sport has ever seen, who can win across different terrain, different races, and different disciplines. They can not only deploy a long, boring break under the most unpromising of circumstances, they can win sprints, mountain stages, cross races and probably would have what it takes to win the world cycle-ball championships if only anyone knew the rules. I don't for a second think it's easy to be that good.

And yes, I feel bad complaining that something so superlative is also a bit dull to watch. But as a time trial specialist whose sole road-race tactic was the long break, I know what I'm talking about, albeit at a lower level. I also know that it's a tactic with its own unique problems.

For a start, where do you attack? The starting points for the solo raid have been getting not so much further from the finish as closer to the start and not always, I think, by design. I once attacked by accident at 75 km to go because I was trying to reset my computer at the front of a slow-moving bunch and neither I nor the bunch was paying much attention.

At a more elevated level, in LiègeBastogne-Liège, Pogačar rode off in a manner that suggested he'd only half meant it, like a little testing attack to see what would happen.