Time For Action
Legal Notes|September - October 2019
Since time immemorial, the environment has had a larger-than-life place in the Indian scheme of things. But the Nineties and the new century have really been a sad story of a virtually unending line of laws failing to combat the increasing levels of pollution brought forth by urbanisation, and the global pressure about greenhouse emissions resulting in the Paris accord that now brings in its wake greater pressure on countries to tighten laws. Amidst all this, India shines as a classic example of the irrational mindset of enacting more laws to produce less pollution. RACHANA RANA BHATTACHARYA, while examining the dizzying number of laws that engulf us and the incredulously lopsided judicial pronouncements made by different courts, poses a simple question: What is the way forward?
- Rachana Rana Bhattacharya
Time For Action

As the children of the world united in a rousing chorus of anger, asking governments, “HOW DARE YOU?” at the UN Summit for Climate Change - it’s time for those in the driver’s seat to realise that they’ve been given fair warning to quit stalling and begin walking the talk.

India has no dearth of laws that govern the environment. There are constitutional provisions, general laws (IPC, CrPC), more than 300 special acts (for environmental protection, water protection and control of pollution, forest conservation, biological diversity, public liability insurance, national green tribunal) as well as National Environment, Forest and Agriculture policies. A host of bodies at the central, state and district levels are in charge of their implementation which is not so easy either. It needs considerable resources, technical expertise, political and social will. Since implementation falls in the domain of the executive, the role of law in the protection of ecosystems is limited. The laissez-faire exhibited towards the Ministry of Environment and the judiciary’s orders (which already has a backlog of over 21,000 environment related cases) to most state governments only deepens the predicament. The unhappy truth is that too many rules and regulations destroy all respect for the law.

There is little coherence in the standards set by the Pollution Control Board and the Tribunals that face a paucity of funds, proper infrastructure or laboratories, manpower and expertise. They also don’t have legal authority and their decisions tend to get overruled. To top it all, the Supreme Court has its own take which leads to contrary views and overlapping orders in numerous cases with the authorities passing the buck to each other even as the environment and citizens are reduced to playing hapless victims.

Water, water, everywhere.

この蚘事は Legal Notes の September - October 2019 版に掲茉されおいたす。

7 日間の Magzter GOLD 無料トラむアルを開始しお、䜕千もの厳遞されたプレミアム ストヌリヌ、9,000 以䞊の雑誌や新聞にアクセスしおください。

この蚘事は Legal Notes の September - October 2019 版に掲茉されおいたす。

7 日間の Magzter GOLD 無料トラむアルを開始しお、䜕千もの厳遞されたプレミアム ストヌリヌ、9,000 以䞊の雑誌や新聞にアクセスしおください。

LEGAL NOTESのその他の蚘事すべお衚瀺
Time For Action
Legal Notes

Time For Action

Since time immemorial, the environment has had a larger-than-life place in the Indian scheme of things. But the Nineties and the new century have really been a sad story of a virtually unending line of laws failing to combat the increasing levels of pollution brought forth by urbanisation, and the global pressure about greenhouse emissions resulting in the Paris accord that now brings in its wake greater pressure on countries to tighten laws. Amidst all this, India shines as a classic example of the irrational mindset of enacting more laws to produce less pollution. RACHANA RANA BHATTACHARYA, while examining the dizzying number of laws that engulf us and the incredulously lopsided judicial pronouncements made by different courts, poses a simple question: What is the way forward?

time-read
10+ 分  |
September - October 2019
Who's Responsible For Fukushima?
Legal Notes

Who's Responsible For Fukushima?

Even as the Fukushima nuclear disaster continues to haunt a section of the Japanese people and the world, a Japanese Court’s decision to acquit the nuclear power company, TEPCO’s bosses after three years of trial, raises questions over the use of nuclear power for energy needs.

time-read
5 分  |
September - October 2019
Tata, Bye-Bye?
Legal Notes

Tata, Bye-Bye?

What would one choose between their right to vote in local body elections and to receive world class civic amenities? The answer isn’t as simple as it looks. Jamshedpur — the land of the Tatas has been struggling with this question for the last 30 years and looks like they still haven’t found an answer. Maintained by the Tatas, there has been a steady incline in the number of voices demanding a government operated municipality to take over the town. In the midst of consecutive orders by various High Courts, the Supreme Court and clashing opinions, SHWETA MENON in her visit to the steel city found that the majority verdict by the janta remains in favour of the Tatas.

time-read
10+ 分  |
September - October 2019
No Winners In The Opioid Case
Legal Notes

No Winners In The Opioid Case

Pain can make you rich and the opioid issue in the US is testimony to that. But other than the wealth it spawned, opioid has generated a huge number of legal cases in the US – and quite a few of them have been filed by the states. Will the Sacklers, one of the richest families in the US and the makers of the pain-relieving drug OxyContin, go scot free?

time-read
9 分  |
September - October 2019
J&-K A Jumble Of Laws
Legal Notes

J&-K A Jumble Of Laws

The transition of Jammu and Kashmir from a state to a Union Territory hasn’t been an easy one.

time-read
2 分  |
September - October 2019
Tourism Of A Different Kind
Legal Notes

Tourism Of A Different Kind

Is settlement tourism making the situation worse in the disputed West Bank region? That is a question that remains to be answered. Despite Airbnb changing course on its earlier decision to ban listings for Israeli settlements in the West Bank, the legal battle continues.

time-read
7 分  |
August 2019
Another Toothless Commission!
Legal Notes

Another Toothless Commission!

There was a walkout by the opposition, protests were staged across the capital, activists were shoved into police vans, letters were written to the President urging him to not sign the amendment and yet the central government was finally able to hit a six in its second attempt this year to amend the RTI (Right to Information) Act!

time-read
3 分  |
August 2019
Labour's “Decent Life” Dreams Continue
Legal Notes

Labour's “Decent Life” Dreams Continue

“Every moving The Code on Wages Bill, 2019 made it a point to inform the Members of the Rajya Sabha that the government had accepted 17 out of the 24 recommendations made by the Standing Committee which had scrutinised a similar bill introduced in the previous Lok Sabha.

time-read
3 分  |
August 2019
Article 370 - The Albatross Around The Neck
Legal Notes

Article 370 - The Albatross Around The Neck

Considered an ‘albatross around the neck’ by the present BJP government at the centre, the sudden and surprising abrogation of Article 370 has opened the doors to a flood of emotions. The abrogation will be debated and tested in the Supreme Court, but it seems that the move has already won in the peoples’ court.

time-read
9 分  |
August 2019
UAPA Amendment: Need Of The Hour
Legal Notes

UAPA Amendment: Need Of The Hour

The Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Amendment Act, 2019, which has received the Presidential assent after being passed in both the Houses of Parliament in the just-concluded session, empowers the National Investigation Agency (NIA) to designate an individual as a “terrorist”.

time-read
6 分  |
August 2019