WITH ROE IN DOUBT, SOME FEAR TECH SURVEILLANCE OF PREGNANCY

When Chandler Jones realized she was pregnant during her junior year of college, she turned to a trusted source for information and advice.

Her cellphone.

"I couldn't imagine before the Internet, trying to navigate this," said Jones, 26, who graduates Tuesday from the University of Baltimore School of Law. "I didn't know if hospitals did abortions. I knew Planned Parenthood did abortions, but there were none near me. So I kind of just Googled."

But with each search, Jones was being surreptitiously followed by the phone apps and browsers that track us as we click away, capturing even our most sensitive health data.

Web searches. Period apps. Fitness trackers. Advice helplines. GPS. The often obscure companies collecting our health history and geolocation data may know more about us than we know ourselves.

For now, the information is mostly used to sell us things. But in a post-Roe world if the Supreme Court soon reverses the 1973 decision that legalized abortion, as a draft opinion suggests it may - pregnancies could be surveilled and the data shared with police or sold to critics or vigilantes.

"The value of these tools for law enforcement is for how they really get to peek into the soul," said Cynthia Conti-Cook, a Ford Foundation technology fellow. "It gives the mental chatter inside our heads.

And our digital trail only becomes clearer when we leave home, as security cameras, license plate readers and other tools track our movements. Their development has raced far ahead of the laws and regulations that might govern them.

For myriad reasons, both political and philosophical, data privacy laws in the U.S. have lagged far behind those adopted in Europe in 2018.