WHEN LINKEDIN LAUNCHED ON MAY 5, 2003, it wasn't a given that it would thrive. Born during the doldrums after the original dotcom bust, it arrived at the same time as a flurry of other social networking upstarts, most of which quickly fizzled. Its emphasis on members' professional lives was seen by some as a strategic blunder. Even the notion of posting your résumé in public was jarringly unfamiliar and likely to be taken as an act of disloyalty.
Rather than falling victim to preexisting assumptions, LinkedIn changed them. Eventually, it was not having a LinkedIn profile that was perceived as a weird career move. As the pandemic and its aftermath have reshaped work, the service has both reflected that new world and equipped workers and employers to succeed in it. Its emphasis on professionalism offers a safe harbor from more toxic and polarizing social platforms.
LinkedIn hasn't escaped the current tech downturn-in February, it announced layoffs-but it's a rare example of a company seeing its greatest success after being bought. When its stock plunged by more than 40% in 2016, Microsoft snapped it up for $26.2 billion but let it chart its own destiny. Today, more than 4,500 job applications are submitted and eight hires are made every minute on the platform. Its revenue surpassed $14 billion in the past 12 months, close to quadruple the figure at the time of acquisition.
The lesson? "The less exciting turtle does win the race sometimes," says Reid Hoffman, the company's co-founder, original guiding light, and first CEO, who went on to become one of the most influential people in Silicon Valley. "We just kept going." To tell LinkedIn's improbable story, we talked to dozens of eyewitnesses, including founders, key employees, early users, independent observers, and current executives. Their comments have been edited for length and clarity.
1997-2003
ãã®èšäºã¯ Fast Company ã® March - April 2023 çã«æ²èŒãããŠããŸãã
7 æ¥éã® Magzter GOLD ç¡æãã©ã€ã¢ã«ãéå§ããŠãäœåãã®å³éžããããã¬ãã¢ã ã¹ããŒãªãŒã9,000 以äžã®éèªãæ°èã«ã¢ã¯ã»ã¹ããŠãã ããã
ãã§ã«è³Œèªè ã§ã ?  ãµã€ã³ã€ã³
ãã®èšäºã¯ Fast Company ã® March - April 2023 çã«æ²èŒãããŠããŸãã
7 æ¥éã® Magzter GOLD ç¡æãã©ã€ã¢ã«ãéå§ããŠãäœåãã®å³éžããããã¬ãã¢ã ã¹ããŒãªãŒã9,000 以äžã®éèªãæ°èã«ã¢ã¯ã»ã¹ããŠãã ããã
ãã§ã«è³Œèªè ã§ã? ãµã€ã³ã€ã³
Where the Clean Energy Jobs Are
A data-driven guide to the skills you need and the opportunities you'll find
CAN WWE PIN THE WORLD?
AS IT MAKES ITS $5 BILLION NETFLIX DEBUT AND PREPARES FOR A GLOBAL AUDIENCE, WWE IS STILL WRESTLING WITH THE TOXIC LEGACY OF ITS COMPLICATED FOUNDER.
RADICAL VISION
POLICE DEPARTMENTS ACROSS THE COUNTRY ARE EMBRACING AI-ENHANCED SURVEILLANCE IN THE NAME OF STOPPING CRIME. HERE'S HOW ONE SECURITY FIRM IS LEADING THE EFFORT AND PROFITING OFF OUR FEARS
Brands That Matter
Our annual look at standout brands encompasses 130 honorees in nine categories, including the inaugural CMOs of the Year. Here's how 12 of those brands and three top CMOs stake out the intersection of business and culture.
The Future According to Google
Google DeepMind, the tech giant's internal AI research lab, isn't just racing to beat OpenAI to market. Under Nobel laureate CEO Demis Hassabis, it's the \"engine room\" of the entire company.
EYE OF THE BEHOLDER
SEPHORA HAS GROWN SO POWERFUL THAT IT CONTROLS WHICH BRANDS LIVE OR DIE IN THE $30 BILLION HIGH-END COSMETICS INDUSTRY. IN THIS BEAUTY CONTEST, SEPHORA ALWAYS WEARS THE CROWN.
CULTURE WARS
Brands on the Run Why Harley-Davidson, Caterpillar, and other masculine\" brands are caving to anti-DEI crusader Robby Starbuck
WORK LIFE
Law Roach, image architect and educator, answers our career questionnaire.
The AI Gadget Debacle
Here's why you shouldn't expect any mind-blowing AI-powered gifts anytime soon.
Why the future workplace will feel more like a hotel
REVEALS WHY THIS IS IMPORTANT TO CORPORATE STRATEGY AND EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT