Does a Just Society Require Just Citizens?

"If men were angels, no government would be necessary. If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary. In framing a government which is to be administered by men over men [...] you must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place oblige it to control itself."
(James Madison and Alexander Hamilton, Federalist Papers)
We are tribal in our political and moral thinking, and project our deficiencies onto others. We rarely live up to our ideals. We are susceptible to motivated reasoning: evaluating evidence in a biased way to arrive at our favored conclusion. We confabulate about our motives and beliefs. This isn't to deny that people can be loving, generous, and self-sacrificing, but to emphasize the dark side of human nature.
Many political philosophers argue that bad citizens make the state a necessity. If we were saints, the state would be unnecessary: people would be good citizens because they recognized it was the right thing to do - there would be no need for state violence to enforce the good. However, we do need the state to protect our right to property, rectify wrongdoing, enforce contracts, take care of the sick and aged, and so forth. The need for the state is thus largely because of individuals who disregard justice murder, theft, and assault are not the fruits of justice. On the flip side, it should be clear why morally perfect citizens wouldn't need a state: they would be willing to do what's right, help each other without fear of exploitation, and so forth. The need for the state amply testifies to the human moral shortcomings.
Introducing Moral Mediocrity
この記事は Philosophy Now の October/November 2023 版に掲載されています。
7 日間の Magzter GOLD 無料トライアルを開始して、何千もの厳選されたプレミアム ストーリー、9,500 以上の雑誌や新聞にアクセスしてください。
すでに購読者です ? サインイン
この記事は Philosophy Now の October/November 2023 版に掲載されています。
7 日間の Magzter GOLD 無料トライアルを開始して、何千もの厳選されたプレミアム ストーリー、9,500 以上の雑誌や新聞にアクセスしてください。
すでに購読者です? サインイン

Affirmative Action for Androids
Jimmy Alfonso Licon asks, when should we prioritise android rights?

Welcome to the Civilization of the Liar's Paradox
Slavoj Žižek uncovers political paradoxes of lying.

The Importance of the Purple
Massimo Pigliucci looks for threads of integrity in a morally compromised world.

Ethics for the Age of AI
Mahmoud Khatami asks, can machines make good moral decisions?

Anand Vaidya (1976-2024)
Manjula Menon on the short but full career of a 'disciplinary trespasser'.

Studying Smarter with AI?
Max Gottschlich on sense and nonsense when using AI in academia.

Excusing God
Raymond Tallis highlights the problem of evil.

Stephen Fry
Perhaps unshockingly for someone who is an actor, broadcaster, comedian, director, narrator and writer, Stephen Fry has a deep interest in words and how we use them. After hearing him lecture on that subject, Marcel Steinbauer-Lewis asked him about Artificial Intelligence and how it connects with the extraordinary lure of language.

Is VR Meaningful Escapism?
Amir Haj-Bolouri enquires into possible meaning through technology.

What Simone de Beauvoir Got — And Didn't Get – About Motherhood
Nura Hossainzadeh argues that motherhood is both physical and transcendent.