Death probe shifts blame from shots

Inquiry into young man’s death fails to address deadly injection

- by SERENA WYLDE

INDUSTRIALISED medicine moulds its army to give blind obedience to prescribed parameters over clinical observation. Wearing blinkers is obligatory.

And if one's salary depends on one not seeing, that is a strong inducement to wilful blindness.

Medics are arguably more vulnerable to authoritarianism - because of their years spent in hierarchical institutions - than your average self-employed person with no higher education.

The NHS has become a political spider's web of entrapment that lures and browbeats the population into receiving unnecessary and harmful interventions with devastating consequences, as exemplified by the case of Jack Last, who died from massive brain haemorrhages as a result of being injected with the AstraZeneca covid 'vaccine'.

Jack, a 27-year-old healthy engineer, had the AstraZeneca injection on March 30, 2021, and almost immediately manifested severe symptoms of cerebral blood clots.

He attended West Suffolk hospital and, three weeks later on April 20, died at Addenbrooke's hospital in Cambridge, to which he had been transferred.

The inquest into his death completed in 2022 found he had died as a direct result of the covid injection.

Yet three years on from his death, a so-called independent review, commissioned by none other than the NHS Suffolk and North East Essex Integrated Care Board, has attributed Jack's death to 'human error and tragic, unfortunate timing'.

And the entire press pack has rallied to divert attention anywhere as long as it's away from the vaccine itself and the NHS's liability in promoting and administering it.