Put communities in charge of conserving sacred groves

The Supreme Court's recent judgment directing the government to adopt measures for the protection of sacred groves brings into focus the fundamental tension between the State and communities in environmental governance.

- Gautam Aredath

Who is better placed to ensure effective outcomes, and how should each support the other? While emphasizing the critical role played by communities in managing sacred groves, the judgment has tipped the scale in favor of the State taking the lead. With the government's chequered record on the subject, it remains unclear if the apex court's directions will make a meaningful difference. The judgment, though well-intentioned, deserves critical scrutiny.

The case is related to orans, sacred groves in Rajasthan, which are sites of religious significance and essential pastures for livestock in this dry region. Land-use changes and weak governance have caused the deterioration of many orans, especially on public lands. With sparse tree cover, they lack the legal protection afforded to forests, easing encroachment. Recently, large solar power projects have emerged as a threat.