TURF WAR

The sharp attacks of the government on the judiciary have seen the latter giving as good as it gets. What does this acrimony augur for litigants and constitutional institutions and offices?

- Sanjay Raman Sinha 

THE simmering tension bet ween the centre and the judiciary found vent yet again in the courtroom and Parliament. It was not just one issue which was raised by the government. Apart from judges’ appointment, the centre has raked up other issues as well. This is being seen as a pressure tactic on the judiciary. Interestingly, the judiciary has not taken this lying down and given a stern reply to the government in the courtroom.

The most recent flashpoint occurred when Law Minister Kiren Rijiju linked pendency of cases with hearing of bail cases by the Supreme Court. The minister argued that the apex court should desist from hearing bail petitions as it undercuts time for other cases. The judiciary was quick to res pond. During a hearing, Chief Justice DY Chandrachud didn’t mince words as he said that no matter is too small or insignificant to not to be heard. He added that if the judiciary doesn’t act and give relief in matters of personal liberty, then what are they doing here? He said this was their responsibility and how can they ignore the demand of the public for justice.

Later in the week, another matter was raised by the government in Parliament. This time it was of judicial holidays. Rijiju, tongue-in-cheek, advised courts to reduce their holidays and work longer hours. In his statement in the Rajya Sabha, Rijiju said there was a feeling among people that long court vacations were not very convenient for justice seekers. He added that it was his obligation and duty to convey the message or sense of this House to the judiciary.