It looks like controversies around works contract are here to stay for some time and the Government will have to tackle this old demon in the new GST regime.
“Works contract” has been a perpetual area of dispute between the Government and assessee. State Governments have always tried to take a view that any sale of goods is subject to state taxes. Since Independence, they have been insisting on levying taxes on the transfer of property in goods in transactions where dominant intention is to provide service element. However, time and again, the courts concluded that where the dominant intention of a transaction is not to sell goods but to provide services, the State Government has no power to tax such transactions. After the states lost this long-fought battle, the Constitution of India, 1950 was amended in 1982 to bring such transactions within the tax domain of the states. This was done vide Article 366(29A), which provides that “tax on sale or purchase of goods” includes tax on the transfer of property in goods (whether as goods or in some other form) involved in the execution of a works contract.
This fight became even more intense when after the introduction of the service tax regime, the Central Government sought to levy tax on the service element of such transactions. The conflict of interest of Central and State Governments often led to increase in tax costs and costs of litigation for the assessee. As a planning option, assessees often bifurcated their single contracts by entering into multiple independent contracts, i.e., (a) contract for the sale of goods and (b) contract for the supply of services, and thus paying sales tax on the sale of goods and service tax on the supply of services. However, this was also a catch-22 situation as it led to another recurring dispute as to whether such splitting of contracts is permissible in transactions for a single project which otherwise could constitute a single contract.
Denne historien er fra May 2017-utgaven av LegalEra.
Start din 7-dagers gratis prøveperiode på Magzter GOLD for å få tilgang til tusenvis av utvalgte premiumhistorier og 9000+ magasiner og aviser.
Allerede abonnent ? Logg på
Denne historien er fra May 2017-utgaven av LegalEra.
Start din 7-dagers gratis prøveperiode på Magzter GOLD for å få tilgang til tusenvis av utvalgte premiumhistorier og 9000+ magasiner og aviser.
Allerede abonnent? Logg på
If You Think Positive Covid Is A Big Opportunity
Senior Vice President and Head of Legal, ESSAR CAPITAL, Badrinath Durvasula, holds forth on his professional journey, the essence of leadership, working from home, books and more…
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT
JOINT VENTURE TRANSACTIONS
NEW ARBITRATION RULES
PUBLISHED BY THE LONDON COURT OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION (LCIA) AND INTERNATIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE (ICC)
M&A in the time of COVID and beyond
What is clear for those engaging in cross-border M&A is that countries around the world are becoming increasingly protective of their economies and industries, with new rules being introduced and existing rules being more widely applied
SWITZERLAND A DIFFERENTIATED APPROACH TO FRAUD
Swiss law interprets the offense of fraud in a special way where in addition to the characteristics of deception and damage as known in many jurisdictions, a qualified lie, i.e. a malicious approach, is required
JOINT VENTURE DISPUTES MEDIATING
Mediation has shown itself to be a powerful tool for bringing a speedy and effective end to crossborder disputes while preserving the commercial relationship between them.
Recognition of HONG KONG INSOLVENCY PROCEEDINGS IN MAINLAND CHINA
A TEST CASE IN THE MAKING?
CONFIDENTIALITY IN ARBITRATION: RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN SINGAPORE
Two recent developments in Singapore case law and legislation reflect a willingness to preserve confidentiality related obligations in all arbitrations
ESSENTIAL GOODS SERVICES UNDER IBC
WHAT DOES IT ESSENTIALLY MEAN?
A BIDEN ADMINISTRATION'S NEW VISION FOR THE AMERICAN WORKPLACE
A LOOK AT THE KEY CHANGES PRESIDENT-ELECT BIDEN IS LIKELY TO MAKE ONCE HE TAKES OFFICE