Stamp Duty On High Court/NCLT Orders Of Amalgamations Of Companies In Different States
M & A Critique|May 2019

There have been lot of mergers/amalgamations over the years where the transferor and transferee companies are registered in different states and have assets in different states.

Stamp Duty On High Court/NCLT Orders Of Amalgamations Of Companies In Different States

Any Amalgamation is carried out by drafting a scheme detailing the transfer of business in whole for a consideration in equity or cash. Currently the schemes are to be presented to the NCLT of each state where the transferor and transferee companies have its registered office. Respective NCLT passes the order sanctioning the scheme. The ORDER, thus passed, is liable to levying of stamp duty.

This is where the trouble is right now, payment of stamp duty is fine but the questions of which state should the stamp duty be paid, how much rebate can one get in case of paying stamp duty in both states, paying stamp duty in the respective state as per the value of assets which are transferred is to be considered or the worst to pay stamp duty in all the relevant states without rebate at full amount applicable. So, the question is the order of which NCLT is primary instrument by which assets and liabilities are transferred hence liable to full stamp duty

There are numerous cases in the past where the companies have gone to their state high courts seeking clarity on the same but there is need for some clarity and guideline as to what is the best way to levy stamp duty and by whom in case of companies in different states.

In our previous article, we had commented on the following case (which is referred here again for the purpose of analysis) , wherein the decision of judiciary led to increase in the transaction cost of amalgamation.

Amalgamation of Reliance Industries, Mumbai and Reliance Petroleum, Gujarat

In the matter of the amalgamation, Bombay High Court held that

1. Amalgamation scheme is not document chargeable to duty. Order passed by the Court sanctioning such a Scheme under Section 394 of the Companies Act,1956 which effects transfer is a document chargeable to Stamp Duty.

2. The Amalgamation Order of High Court is the instrument. It is not incidental.

Denne historien er fra May 2019-utgaven av M & A Critique.

Start din 7-dagers gratis prøveperiode på Magzter GOLD for å få tilgang til tusenvis av utvalgte premiumhistorier og 9000+ magasiner og aviser.

Denne historien er fra May 2019-utgaven av M & A Critique.

Start din 7-dagers gratis prøveperiode på Magzter GOLD for å få tilgang til tusenvis av utvalgte premiumhistorier og 9000+ magasiner og aviser.

FLERE HISTORIER FRA M & A CRITIQUESe alt
Raymond Group continues Segregation of its Business Verticals
M & A Critique

Raymond Group continues Segregation of its Business Verticals

After successful demerger of \"Lifestyle Business,\" Raymond Limited announced yet another restructuring to unlock further value for stakeholders.

time-read
3 mins  |
August 2024
Ultratech Cements adds India Cement in its shopping cart
M & A Critique

Ultratech Cements adds India Cement in its shopping cart

India's Cement Industry is poised for consolidation. In recent past we have seen multiple large & small acquisitions in cement segment for consolidating positions.

time-read
3 mins  |
August 2024
Valor Estate Limited: "Diversification" to "Sepration" of Hospitality Business
M & A Critique

Valor Estate Limited: "Diversification" to "Sepration" of Hospitality Business

“From investments in hospitality business, the demerger transaction will enable VEL to start its construction in hospitality”

time-read
4 mins  |
August 2024
SIEMENS Energy to be a separate entity in alignment with global strategy
M & A Critique

SIEMENS Energy to be a separate entity in alignment with global strategy

Siemens AG announced its Vision 2020+ which included the spin-off of its Gas & Power [G&P) i.e., Energy Business into Siemens Energy.

time-read
5 mins  |
June 2024
Arvind Group separates its Advanced Material Business for independent growth trajectory
M & A Critique

Arvind Group separates its Advanced Material Business for independent growth trajectory

Advanced Material Business (AMD) of Arvind Limited focuses on advanced materials and caters to customer needs across the textile value chain, including specialty yarns, fabrics, and ready-made products.

time-read
3 mins  |
June 2024
Merger for bail-out from debt obligation
M & A Critique

Merger for bail-out from debt obligation

Ind Swift Limited (herein after also referred to as 'ISL' or 'Transferor Company') is engaged in the business of manufacturing of Pharmaceutical Products.

time-read
3 mins  |
June 2024
Batliboi Ltd. merging its associate company
M & A Critique

Batliboi Ltd. merging its associate company

Batliboi Limited has a history of collaborations with various foreign technical partners and has subsidiaries like Hydraulic & General Engineers Ltd. and Batliboi International Ltd. In March 2024, the board of Directors of Batliboi Limited accorded their approval for the merger of promoter owned private company with itself.

time-read
2 mins  |
May 2024
TVS Motors issuances of convertible preference shares as bonus instead of dividend
M & A Critique

TVS Motors issuances of convertible preference shares as bonus instead of dividend

Recently, well known auto manufacturer announced the issuance of preference shares as a bonus to all equity shareholders.

time-read
3 mins  |
May 2024
Aditya Birla Fashion & Retails Scheme to undo its consolidation
M & A Critique

Aditya Birla Fashion & Retails Scheme to undo its consolidation

Corporate restructuring saga continues for Aditya Birla Group.

time-read
5 mins  |
May 2024
Advent International to combine its listed & private entity business
M & A Critique

Advent International to combine its listed & private entity business

Recently, Advent International announced the merger of its privately held pharma company into recently acquired listed pharma company.

time-read
6 mins  |
April 2024