When peer review fails, how can journalists, researchers, and lawmakers be more vigilant?
Brian Wansink had it all: a high-profile lab at Cornell University, more than 200 scientific studies to his name, and a best-selling book. Plus, his research was really cool. Wansink studied how physical cues affect our eating habits. He found, for example, that people who leave their cereal in plain view tend to weigh more than people who keep it out of sight, and that people consume more when they use bigger plates. I profiled him for Mother Jones in 2015 and sifted through dozens of his papers. Like the junk food he studied, his work had an almost addictive quality.
Here’s the problem: It’s no longer clear how much of Wansink’s work can withstand scientific scrutiny. In January 2017, a research team published a review of four of his papers and turned up roughly 150 inconsistencies. Since then, in a slowly unfolding scandal, Wansink’s data, methods, and integrity have been called into question. In September, the Journal of the American Medical
Association (JAMA) Network retracted six articles he co-authored. To date, at least 15 Wansink studies have been retracted. The day after the JAMA retractions, Cornell announced that an internal investigation had found evidence of academic misconduct; Wansink was promptly relieved of his teaching and research duties. (Wansink has admitted to some mistakes in methodology but stands by his work.)
Were there warning signs I missed? Maybe. But I wasn’t alone. Wansink’s studies went through hundreds of peer reviews—often at journals considered some of the most prestigious in their fields. The federal government didn’t look close enough, either: In 2007, Wansink was named head of the US Department of Agri culture’s Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion. There, he helped craft the national 2010 dietary guidelines.
Denne historien er fra January/February 2019-utgaven av Mother Jones.
Start din 7-dagers gratis prøveperiode på Magzter GOLD for å få tilgang til tusenvis av utvalgte premiumhistorier og 9000+ magasiner og aviser.
Allerede abonnent ? Logg på
Denne historien er fra January/February 2019-utgaven av Mother Jones.
Start din 7-dagers gratis prøveperiode på Magzter GOLD for å få tilgang til tusenvis av utvalgte premiumhistorier og 9000+ magasiner og aviser.
Allerede abonnent? Logg på
Data Blockers- Overturning Roe didn't just bludgeon abortion access. It sabotaged science, too.
Overturning Roe didn't just bludgeon abortion access. It sabotaged science, too. In early May 2022, reproductive health researcher Liz Mosley was at a dinner celebrating her first day as an assistant professor at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine when the news broke: A leaked draft of the Dobbs decision revealed the Supreme Court’s plan to gut abortion rights in the United States—the “worst-case scenario,” as one dinner guest put it.
Growing Pains - Why are governors rejecting funds for kids' summer meals?
The Summer Electronic Benefit Transfer Program for Children (EBT), the first new federal food aid initiative in decades, is a permanent extension of Congress’ Covid-era relief that sought to provide extra meals for more than 30 million school kids who qualify for free or reduced-price lunches. But more than 10 million children will miss out this summer, according to the USDA. Thirteen other states—Alabama, Alaska, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Louisiana, Mississippi, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, and Wyoming—also chose not to enroll. And they all have something else in common: Republican governors.
Mission from God. Church And Statehood– A new Puerto Rican political party puts faith before status.
A new Puerto Rican political party puts faith before status. Puerto Rico’s churches, which in recent decades were mostly confined to private life, are now reshaping political dynamics. Proyecto Dignidad is a reflection of a broader populist global trend, and it draws inspiration from the Trump playbook and other domestic right-wing currents that helped him win over significant numbers of Latino voters in 2020.
40 Acres and a Lie
We compiled Reconstruction-era documents to identify 1,250 formerly enslaved Black Americans given land-only to have it returned to their enslavers.
The Conversion Therapist Will See You Now
The counselors once discredited for their "ex-gay" theories have rebranded. And now they're coming after trans kids.
"I Hope My Hindsight Will Be Others' Foresight"
A decade after Elliot Rodger's horrific massacre, his mother is on a quest to help threat assessment experts-and other parents-prevent the next tragedy.
RAGING BULL DONALD TRUMP'S PUGILISTIC SPOKESMAN HAS TAKEN CAMPAIGNING TO A WHOLE NEW LEVEL OF LOW.
IN late February, after Donald Trump had nearly vanquished the entirety of the Republican primary field, his spokesman, Steven Cheung, took aim at the one opponent still standing. \"Birdbrain, are you a liar or just plain stupid?\" he posted on X.
SAVED
Finding self-love after Christian conversion therapy
WHAT WE ARE OWED
Technology and genealogy have made the case for reparations specific-and undeniable.
PARADISE STOLEN
Black families were cheated out of their land on Skidaway Island. Now it's a wealthy white enclave