DELHI HIGH COURT RESERVED VERDICT ON ARVIND KEJRIWAL'S PLEA CHALLENGING ED ARREST IN LIQUOR POLICY CASE
The Business Guardian|April 04, 2024
The Delhi High Court in the case Arvind Kejriwal v. Directorate Of Enforcement observed and has reserved verdict on the plea moved by Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal challenging his arrest by the Enforcement Directorate, ED in the money laundering case related to the alleged liquor policy scam case.

The bench headed by Justice Sharma in the case observed and has denied any interim relief to Kejriwal and only issued notice on his plea challenging the arrest, as well as his interim application seeking immediate release.

In the present case, Kejriwal is currently in judicial custody. Kejriwal was being arrested on the night of March 21.

The Trial Court in the case remanded him to six days of ED custody, which was extended by further four days. On April 01, he was remanded to judicial custody till April 15.

It has been stated by the Enforcement Directorate, ED that Kejriwal is the kingpin and the key conspirator of the excise scam and there were reasons to believe on the basis of material in its possession that he was guilty of the offence of money laundering.

It has also been alleged that the Aam Aadmi party was the ‘major beneficiary’ of the proceeds of the crime and has committed the offence through Kejriwal.

The response stated that, the Aam Aadmi Party, AAP is the major beneficiary of the proceeds of crime generated in the Delhi Liquor Scam. The Sh Arvind Kejriwal was and is not only the brain behind the AAP but also controls its major activities, he was also one of the founding members and was also involved in the decision making of the policy as evident from the statements of the witnesses.

ARGUMENTS:

Denne historien er fra April 04, 2024-utgaven av The Business Guardian.

Start din 7-dagers gratis prøveperiode på Magzter GOLD for å få tilgang til tusenvis av utvalgte premiumhistorier og 9000+ magasiner og aviser.

Denne historien er fra April 04, 2024-utgaven av The Business Guardian.

Start din 7-dagers gratis prøveperiode på Magzter GOLD for å få tilgang til tusenvis av utvalgte premiumhistorier og 9000+ magasiner og aviser.

FLERE HISTORIER FRA THE BUSINESS GUARDIANSe alt
ATISHI TAKES CHARGE AS DELHI'S CM, KEEPS ONE EMPTY CHAIR FOR KEJRIWAL
The Business Guardian

ATISHI TAKES CHARGE AS DELHI'S CM, KEEPS ONE EMPTY CHAIR FOR KEJRIWAL

Atishi expressed confidence in Kejriwal's return as CM, criticizing BJP's attempts to tarnish his image through OW imprisonment.

time-read
2 mins  |
September 24, 2024
2020 defamation case filed by BJP leader against Kejriwal, Atishi proceeds
The Business Guardian

2020 defamation case filed by BJP leader against Kejriwal, Atishi proceeds

The Rouse Avenue court on Monday listed the defamation case filed against Delhi CM Atishi Marlena, former CM Arvind Kejriwal and others for consideration of arguments on charge.

time-read
1 min  |
September 24, 2024
The Business Guardian

Gang of auto thieves involved in stealing of high-end vehicles busted

Delhi police have busted a gang of auto lifters which was involved in stealing of high end vehicles in the national capital, it said Monday.

time-read
2 mins  |
September 24, 2024
Rau's IAS CEO, coordinator granted interim bail
The Business Guardian

Rau's IAS CEO, coordinator granted interim bail

Earlier, the Delhi High Court had asked the CBI to submit a status report addressing the primary causes of waterlogging in the area and the rainfall data from that day.

time-read
1 min  |
September 24, 2024
Attack on turban during clash at DU's Khalsa College, FIR filed
The Business Guardian

Attack on turban during clash at DU's Khalsa College, FIR filed

Two groups of students clashed at Delhi University's Khalsa College, during which a student's turban fell off.

time-read
1 min  |
September 24, 2024
DELHI HIGH COURT: FLIPKART'S 'LATCHING-ON' FEATURE CANNOT BE USED TO SELL COUNTERFEIT PRODUCTS OR MISLEAD GULLIBLE PUBLIC
The Business Guardian

DELHI HIGH COURT: FLIPKART'S 'LATCHING-ON' FEATURE CANNOT BE USED TO SELL COUNTERFEIT PRODUCTS OR MISLEAD GULLIBLE PUBLIC

The court in the case observed that sale of the products by the two individual defendants by passing off their products as those emanating from \"Maharaja\" brand on Flipkart cannot be allowed. The court stated that, the feature of latching-on cannot be used to either sell counterfeit products, or to mislead the gullible public into purchasing products, as emanating from a particular source, when they do not so originate from the said source.

time-read
2 mins  |
September 24, 2024
The Supreme Court in the case Suresh Khanderao Chavhanke vs.
The Business Guardian

The Supreme Court in the case Suresh Khanderao Chavhanke vs.

The Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanam Trust And Other was hearing the petition filed in wake of controversy regarding the alleged use of adulterated ghee in preparing the laddus at the Tirumala Tirupati Temple.

time-read
1 min  |
September 24, 2024
The Business Guardian

Delhi Government To Supreme Court: Remission Pleas Stalled Due To Ex-CM Arvind Kejriwal's Incarceration Can Be Processed Now

Earlier, it has been informed by the Delhi Government to the Court that the processing of remission pleas had been stalled because the then CM Kejriwal was unable to sign the necessary files due to his incarceration.

time-read
2 mins  |
September 24, 2024
The Business Guardian

Supreme Court Stays NGT Order Directing Punjab Government To Pay 1,026 Crores For Failure To Treat Sewage Waste

The Supreme Court in the case State of Punjab v.Union of India, UOI observed and has stayed the order of the National Green Tribunal, NGT, wherein the court directed the state of Punjab to pay 1,026 Crores to the Central Pollution Control Board as environment compensation for failure to manage legacy waste and untreated sewage.

time-read
1 min  |
September 24, 2024
Supreme Court Set Aside Order Dismissing FIR Quashing Petition As 'Infructuous' Due To Petitioner's Arrest
The Business Guardian

Supreme Court Set Aside Order Dismissing FIR Quashing Petition As 'Infructuous' Due To Petitioner's Arrest

The Supreme Court in the case Vidhu Gupta v.State of UP observed and has criticized a decision of the Allahabad High Court, which declared a petition seeking the quashing of an FIR as 'infructuous' solely because the petitioner had been arrested.

time-read
1 min  |
September 24, 2024