The Division bench comprising of Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma and Justice Sanjay Vashisth was hearing the present matter.
The Appellate Authority in the case dismissed the appeal as it being not maintainable which being on the ground that the assessee or petitioner had failed to pay an amount of Rs. 10,000/- as fee for hearing the appeal while the assessee was required to deposit a total sum of Rs. 20,000/- as fee.
Denne historien er fra December 10, 2024-utgaven av The Business Guardian.
Start din 7-dagers gratis prøveperiode på Magzter GOLD for å få tilgang til tusenvis av utvalgte premiumhistorier og 9000+ magasiner og aviser.
Allerede abonnent ? Logg på
Denne historien er fra December 10, 2024-utgaven av The Business Guardian.
Start din 7-dagers gratis prøveperiode på Magzter GOLD for å få tilgang til tusenvis av utvalgte premiumhistorier og 9000+ magasiner og aviser.
Allerede abonnent? Logg på
Taural India inks MoU to expand Supa manufacturing in Maharashtra
Taural India, a leading world class integrated aluminium foundry, and the Government of Maharashtra have signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) to expand the company’s advanced manufacturing facility in Supa, Ahilya Nagar, Maharashtra.
MEIL, SR Foundations bring Sri Jagannath Temple to Maha Kumbh 2025
MEIL Foundation and SR Foundation Unite for Spiritual and Societal Upliftment.
Greaves Cotton Q3 FY25: Diversified strategy drives growth and strong margins
Greaves Cotton Limited, a leading diversified engineering company in India, has reported strong financial results for the period ending December 31, 2024.
SUPREME COURT ASKS SIT TO PROBE: DID NOIDA AUTHORITIES PAY EXCESS COMPENSATION TO LANDOWNERS? WHETHER NOIDA LACKS TRANSPARENCY?
The Supreme Court in the case Virendra Singh Nagar v. State of Uttar Pradesh and another constituted a Special Investigation Team, SIT to investigate whether the officers of the New Okhla Industrial Development Authority, NOIDA paid excess land acquisition compensation to certain land owners.
Legally defensible but politically indefensible
Sedition IPC and Section 152 BNS: In 2022 the Supreme Court of India bad suspended the trial of cases under Section 124A IPC taking cognizance of its misuse given its broad ambit and directed the government to reconsider this law. The context to it is important there bad been rise in registration of sedition cases during 2010 and 2021. Further conviction rate is as low as 33 percent indicating the falsity of cases.
SUPREME COURT: PLAINT WITH MULTIPLE RELIEFS CANNOT BE REJECTED JUST BECAUSE SOME RELIEFS ARE BARRED UNDER ORDER VII RULE 11 OF CPC
The Supreme Court in the case Central Bank Of India And Anr. Versus Smt. Prabha Jain And Ors observed that when a Plaint includes multiple reliefs, it cannot be rejected solely because one of the reliefs is being barred by law, as long as the other reliefs remain valid.
BATAIYO, INDIA'S FIRST ZERO-COMMISSION SUPER APP, LAUNCHES ON JANUARY 26, 2025
Bataiyo revolutionizes service connections with a zero-commission, trust-based platform launching on Republic Day.
SC appoints SIT to probe illegal compensation in NOIDA
Dissatisfied with a UP government-appointed panel probing the issue of illegal compensation to land owners paid by NOIDA officials, the Supreme Court has appointed an SIT to look into it.
Supreme Court reserves treasurer post for women in Bengaluru Advocates' Association; suggests 30% women reservation in General Council
The Supreme Court in the case Kavitha H.C. Versus The State Of Karnataka And Ors and connected cases observed and has directed that the post of Treasurer be exclusively earmarked for women candidates.
Fake lawyer's issue: SC says verification of advocates must be expedited, seeks BCI report in 8 weeks
The Supreme Court in the case Bar Council Of India Versus Poonam Ashok Goud observed and has expressed serious concern over the delay caused in the verification of advocates’ law degrees and enrolment by the Bar Councils.
