The myth of absolutes in a world of contexts

True freedom, justice, and truth are not found in rigid, unyielding principles, but in the thoughtful consideration of context

- SRINATH SRIDHARAN

In an age where the pursuit of absolutes seems almost instinctual, it is crucial to acknowledge that there is nothing absolute about anything. The idea of absolutes, whether in freedom, justice, or truth, is a comforting illusion, yet it remains just that—an illusion.

Life, laws, and societal norms are deeply entrenched in context, and it is within this context that they derive their true meaning and relevance. Take, for instance, the concept of freedom. We often hear the rallying cry for "absolute freedom," as though it is a universal right that stands above all others. However, the reality is far more complex. Freedom without limits is not freedom; it is chaos. To live in a society means to navigate a delicate balance between individual liberties and collective responsibilities. The very laws and regulations that some might see as shackles are, in fact, the frameworks that allow freedom to exist in a sustainable form. These laws are not arbitrary constraints; they are the pillars that support the edifice of a functioning society.

"Absolute freedom" is a term frequently championed by libertarians as the ultimate ideal—a state where individuals are free from all constraints. But is this concept truly feasible, or even desirable? In theory, absolute freedom suggests an unrestricted existence where individuals act solely according to their own will. However, does such an ideal ignore the complexities of social interactions and the inevitable need for some form of regulation (be it self-regulated or socially regulated or legally) to ensure collective harmony? Could the pursuit of absolute freedom overlook the balance required to protect vulnerable individuals and maintain societal order? The question then arises: Is absolute freedom a realistic expectation, or does it merely serve as a philosophical ideal that fails to account for the nuanced realities of human coexistence?