While the GST, ever since it was implemented, has remained a topic of debate in public and private forums, the article looks at how the tax has fared for the first six months of its existence
The Goods and Services Tax (GST) was implemented in India with a premise to improve the ease of doing business, reduce overall cost of goods and services for the ultimate consumer, lessen tax compliance, enhance economic efficiency, and achieve growth and one uniform common market.
GST is India’s most comprehensive indirect tax reform since independence. It has subsumed most of the erstwhile indirect taxes, barring a few. It has remained a topic of debate in public and private forums leading to animated discussions regarding challenges posed by the unique and diverse needs of the Indian market and solutions thereof.
GST implemented in India has been a path-breaking and admirable effort. The Indian Government undoubtedly deserves the credit for bringing multilayered and several geographically defined taxpayers under one umbrella.
However, the complicated tax structure has not been easy to comprehend; also, the implementation of GST has not received much fanfare, as was expected, and it does not completely conform to the features of an ideal GST owing to India’s federal structure.
The implementation of GST has unfortunately seen apprehension about chaotic fillings of various returns and forms, high tax rates, delayed refunds, and payment of GST under the reverse charge mechanism on procurement from an unregistered dealer.
Frequent changes in the GST legislation witnessed that the new ecosystem is unsettled, and it has been widely felt by the tax community that the implementation of GST was a rushed decision, which did not achieve the various objectives for which it was introduced, and indeed, has cost the Indian economy.
Six-Month Report Card
This story is from the January 2018 edition of Legal Era.
Start your 7-day Magzter GOLD free trial to access thousands of curated premium stories, and 9,000+ magazines and newspapers.
Already a subscriber ? Sign In
This story is from the January 2018 edition of Legal Era.
Start your 7-day Magzter GOLD free trial to access thousands of curated premium stories, and 9,000+ magazines and newspapers.
Already a subscriber? Sign In
If You Think Positive Covid Is A Big Opportunity
Senior Vice President and Head of Legal, ESSAR CAPITAL, Badrinath Durvasula, holds forth on his professional journey, the essence of leadership, working from home, books and more…
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT
JOINT VENTURE TRANSACTIONS
NEW ARBITRATION RULES
PUBLISHED BY THE LONDON COURT OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION (LCIA) AND INTERNATIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE (ICC)
M&A in the time of COVID and beyond
What is clear for those engaging in cross-border M&A is that countries around the world are becoming increasingly protective of their economies and industries, with new rules being introduced and existing rules being more widely applied
SWITZERLAND A DIFFERENTIATED APPROACH TO FRAUD
Swiss law interprets the offense of fraud in a special way where in addition to the characteristics of deception and damage as known in many jurisdictions, a qualified lie, i.e. a malicious approach, is required
JOINT VENTURE DISPUTES MEDIATING
Mediation has shown itself to be a powerful tool for bringing a speedy and effective end to crossborder disputes while preserving the commercial relationship between them.
Recognition of HONG KONG INSOLVENCY PROCEEDINGS IN MAINLAND CHINA
A TEST CASE IN THE MAKING?
CONFIDENTIALITY IN ARBITRATION: RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN SINGAPORE
Two recent developments in Singapore case law and legislation reflect a willingness to preserve confidentiality related obligations in all arbitrations
ESSENTIAL GOODS SERVICES UNDER IBC
WHAT DOES IT ESSENTIALLY MEAN?
A BIDEN ADMINISTRATION'S NEW VISION FOR THE AMERICAN WORKPLACE
A LOOK AT THE KEY CHANGES PRESIDENT-ELECT BIDEN IS LIKELY TO MAKE ONCE HE TAKES OFFICE