On March 2, the Madras High Court referred to a third judge the petitions challenging Telecom Regulatory Authority of India’s (TRAI’s) March 2017 tariff order related to pricing of television channels offered as a bouquet, after a two-judge bench including Chief Justice Indira Banerjee and Justice M Sundar delivered a split verdict in the matter.
Star India and its subsidiary Vijay Television Pvt. Ltd. had filed a petition against the tariff order “Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable) Services (Eighth) (Addressable Systems) Tariff Order, 2017 and the Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable) Services Interconnection (Addressable Systems) Regulations, 2017 (hereafter referred to as ‘impugned provisions’)” released by TRAI in March 2017. The tariff order included regulations for pricing, packaging of channels, fixed tariff for carriage, and other such aspects.
The two-judge bench suggested that TRAI can offer regulations on the carriage front, but it cannot govern content-related pricing.
Upholding the impugned regulations, the tariff order on pricing and packaging of TV channels offered in a bouquet, and a cap on channel prices, the Chief Justice then said, “In my considered view, the challenge to the impugned regulation and the tariff order fails.” However, the Chief Justice held as “arbitrary” the clause putting a cap of 15 percent on discount on the maximum retail price of a bouquet and said that it was “not enforceable”.
This story is from the April 2018 edition of Legal Era.
Start your 7-day Magzter GOLD free trial to access thousands of curated premium stories, and 9,000+ magazines and newspapers.
Already a subscriber ? Sign In
This story is from the April 2018 edition of Legal Era.
Start your 7-day Magzter GOLD free trial to access thousands of curated premium stories, and 9,000+ magazines and newspapers.
Already a subscriber? Sign In
If You Think Positive Covid Is A Big Opportunity
Senior Vice President and Head of Legal, ESSAR CAPITAL, Badrinath Durvasula, holds forth on his professional journey, the essence of leadership, working from home, books and more…
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT
JOINT VENTURE TRANSACTIONS
NEW ARBITRATION RULES
PUBLISHED BY THE LONDON COURT OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION (LCIA) AND INTERNATIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE (ICC)
M&A in the time of COVID and beyond
What is clear for those engaging in cross-border M&A is that countries around the world are becoming increasingly protective of their economies and industries, with new rules being introduced and existing rules being more widely applied
SWITZERLAND A DIFFERENTIATED APPROACH TO FRAUD
Swiss law interprets the offense of fraud in a special way where in addition to the characteristics of deception and damage as known in many jurisdictions, a qualified lie, i.e. a malicious approach, is required
JOINT VENTURE DISPUTES MEDIATING
Mediation has shown itself to be a powerful tool for bringing a speedy and effective end to crossborder disputes while preserving the commercial relationship between them.
Recognition of HONG KONG INSOLVENCY PROCEEDINGS IN MAINLAND CHINA
A TEST CASE IN THE MAKING?
CONFIDENTIALITY IN ARBITRATION: RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN SINGAPORE
Two recent developments in Singapore case law and legislation reflect a willingness to preserve confidentiality related obligations in all arbitrations
ESSENTIAL GOODS SERVICES UNDER IBC
WHAT DOES IT ESSENTIALLY MEAN?
A BIDEN ADMINISTRATION'S NEW VISION FOR THE AMERICAN WORKPLACE
A LOOK AT THE KEY CHANGES PRESIDENT-ELECT BIDEN IS LIKELY TO MAKE ONCE HE TAKES OFFICE
