In a historic judgment on 6 September 2018, the Supreme Court of India struck down part of Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) which criminalizes homosexual relationships between consenting adults.
The main 166-page judgment authored by former Chief Justice Dipak Misra along with Justice A.M. Khanwilkar began with a quote by the great German thinker, Johann Wolfgang Von Goethe: “I am what I am, so take me as I am.”
The judgment described the Constitution as “a living and organic document capable of expansion with the changing needs and demands of the society” and stressed that “the Courts must robe themselves with the armory of progressive and pragmatic interpretation to combat the evils of inequality and injustice that try to creep into the society.”
Constitutional morality embraces several virtues, the foremost being espousal of a pluralistic and inclusive society, the order read. “The veil of social morality cannot be used to violate the fundamental rights of even a single individual, for the foundation of Constitutional morality rests upon the recognition of diversity that pervades the society,” it stated.
Discrimination on the basis of one’s sexual orientation would entail a violation of the fundamental right of freedom of expression, said the judgment. “Section 377 of the IPC subjects the LGBT community to societal pariah and dereliction, and is, therefore, manifestly arbitrary, for it has become an odious weapon for the harassment of the LGBT community by subjecting them to discrimination and unequal treatment,” it read.
This story is from the November 2018 edition of Legal Era.
Start your 7-day Magzter GOLD free trial to access thousands of curated premium stories, and 9,000+ magazines and newspapers.
Already a subscriber ? Sign In
This story is from the November 2018 edition of Legal Era.
Start your 7-day Magzter GOLD free trial to access thousands of curated premium stories, and 9,000+ magazines and newspapers.
Already a subscriber? Sign In
If You Think Positive Covid Is A Big Opportunity
Senior Vice President and Head of Legal, ESSAR CAPITAL, Badrinath Durvasula, holds forth on his professional journey, the essence of leadership, working from home, books and more…
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT
JOINT VENTURE TRANSACTIONS
NEW ARBITRATION RULES
PUBLISHED BY THE LONDON COURT OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION (LCIA) AND INTERNATIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE (ICC)
M&A in the time of COVID and beyond
What is clear for those engaging in cross-border M&A is that countries around the world are becoming increasingly protective of their economies and industries, with new rules being introduced and existing rules being more widely applied
SWITZERLAND A DIFFERENTIATED APPROACH TO FRAUD
Swiss law interprets the offense of fraud in a special way where in addition to the characteristics of deception and damage as known in many jurisdictions, a qualified lie, i.e. a malicious approach, is required
JOINT VENTURE DISPUTES MEDIATING
Mediation has shown itself to be a powerful tool for bringing a speedy and effective end to crossborder disputes while preserving the commercial relationship between them.
Recognition of HONG KONG INSOLVENCY PROCEEDINGS IN MAINLAND CHINA
A TEST CASE IN THE MAKING?
CONFIDENTIALITY IN ARBITRATION: RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN SINGAPORE
Two recent developments in Singapore case law and legislation reflect a willingness to preserve confidentiality related obligations in all arbitrations
ESSENTIAL GOODS SERVICES UNDER IBC
WHAT DOES IT ESSENTIALLY MEAN?
A BIDEN ADMINISTRATION'S NEW VISION FOR THE AMERICAN WORKPLACE
A LOOK AT THE KEY CHANGES PRESIDENT-ELECT BIDEN IS LIKELY TO MAKE ONCE HE TAKES OFFICE