TATA-MISTRY NCLAT JUDGMENT FOR BOARDROOMS & GOVERNANCE
Legal Era|January 2020
Whatever the outcome of the Tata-Mistry feud, it will greatly impact the way majority shareholders conduct themselves and the way boards are managed in India going forward
TATA-MISTRY NCLAT JUDGMENT FOR BOARDROOMS & GOVERNANCE

The order of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) in Cyrus Investments Pvt. Ltd Vs. Tata Sons Ltd. & Ors. (Company Appeal (AT) No. 254 of 2018) is landmark and one that compels a relook at boardrooms and corporate governance.

Following his removal, Mistry, pursuant to the decision of the Board of Directors’ of M/s. Tata Sons Limited, dated 24th October, 2016 as its ‘Executive Chairman’, Mistry/ Minority group of shareholders had moved the NCLT alleging prejudicial and acts of oppression by the majority shareholders backing Tata. Upon the NCLT rejecting the pleas of Mistry/Minority shareholders, Mistry had appealed to the NCLAT.

The NCLAT, in its order finds fault with the conduct of Tata/Majority shareholders in as much as the affirmative voting power of the nominated Directors of the ‘Tata Trusts’ over majority decisions of the Board. Such affirmative voting power has been seen as going against the spirit of independent and effective functioning of Boards. Such voting rights are thus against the spirit of transparent board functioning as managements and boards are expected to conduct themselves as trustees for all stakeholders. The recent recommendations of the Kotak Committee on corporate governance give strength to this expected line of conduct of boards.

The NCLAT order therefore suggests that the fact that the Company (‘Tata Sons Limited’) has suffered loss because of ‘prejudicial’ decisions taken by the Board of Directors. The conduct of the board in the manner in which Mistry was suddenly and hastily removed without any reason and the absence of any discussion in the board meeting followed his removal as Director(s) of different ‘Tata Companies’ did not meet the requirements of transparent and independent functioning of the board.

This story is from the January 2020 edition of Legal Era.

Start your 7-day Magzter GOLD free trial to access thousands of curated premium stories, and 9,000+ magazines and newspapers.

This story is from the January 2020 edition of Legal Era.

Start your 7-day Magzter GOLD free trial to access thousands of curated premium stories, and 9,000+ magazines and newspapers.

MORE STORIES FROM LEGAL ERAView All
M&A in the time of COVID and beyond
Legal Era

M&A in the time of COVID and beyond

What is clear for those engaging in cross-border M&A is that countries around the world are becoming increasingly protective of their economies and industries, with new rules being introduced and existing rules being more widely applied

time-read
6 mins  |
December 2020
SWITZERLAND A DIFFERENTIATED APPROACH TO FRAUD
Legal Era

SWITZERLAND A DIFFERENTIATED APPROACH TO FRAUD

Swiss law interprets the offense of fraud in a special way where in addition to the characteristics of deception and damage as known in many jurisdictions, a qualified lie, i.e. a malicious approach, is required

time-read
5 mins  |
December 2020
JOINT VENTURE DISPUTES MEDIATING
Legal Era

JOINT VENTURE DISPUTES MEDIATING

Mediation has shown itself to be a powerful tool for bringing a speedy and effective end to crossborder disputes while preserving the commercial relationship between them.

time-read
7 mins  |
December 2020
ESSENTIAL GOODS SERVICES UNDER IBC
Legal Era

ESSENTIAL GOODS SERVICES UNDER IBC

WHAT DOES IT ESSENTIALLY MEAN?

time-read
6 mins  |
December 2020
PAYPAL TO ALLOW CRYPTOCURRENCIES AFTER OBTAINING A NEW YORK LICENSE
Legal Era

PAYPAL TO ALLOW CRYPTOCURRENCIES AFTER OBTAINING A NEW YORK LICENSE

PayPal has decided to embrace cryptocurrencies and will soon offer its customers in the United States (U.S.) the ability to buy, hold, sell, and use various virtual currencies. The company has obtained a New York license allowing it to do so.

time-read
1 min  |
November 2020
Legal Era

YOU HAVE A PATENT WHAT NEXT?

Getting a patent granted is not an end in itself but most patentees do not realize that

time-read
5 mins  |
November 2020
PROCEEDINGS AGAINST PERSONAL GUARANTORS IN NCLT CURRENT SITUATION
Legal Era

PROCEEDINGS AGAINST PERSONAL GUARANTORS IN NCLT CURRENT SITUATION

Presently, the simultaneous commencement of insolvency proceedings by the lender against the corporate debtor and the corporate guarantor(s) faces a roadblock on account of the NCLAT order in the matter of Dr. Vishnu Kumar Agarwal v. Piramal Enterprises Limited (“Piramal matter”)

time-read
5 mins  |
November 2020
Legal Era

PARENTAL ALIENATION

India Joins Family Courts Around the World to Fight Child Emotional Abuse

time-read
7 mins  |
November 2020
Legal Era

Parties may not seek discovery in USA in aid of FOREIGN-SEATED ARBITRATIONS

A CIRCUIT SPLIT HAS EMERGED OVER THE USE OF SECTION 1782 TO OBTAIN DISCOVERY IN AID OF PRIVATE COMMERCIAL ARBITRATIONS SEATED OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES...

time-read
4 mins  |
November 2020
Mediation: As A Mode Of Alternate Dispute Resolution
Legal Era

Mediation: As A Mode Of Alternate Dispute Resolution

The provision of mediation as a mode of adr in the indian legal system, dates back to year 1947 when the industrial disputes act, was passed…

time-read
6 mins  |
October 2020