Abelard & Carneades Yes & No
Philosophy Now|June/July 2024
Frank Breslin says 'yes and no' to presenting both sides of an argument.
Frank Breslin
Abelard & Carneades Yes & No

Should you have antiquarian interests, at some point you may want to read the medieval treatise Sic et Non written in 1120 by French theologian Peter Abelard (10791142 CE). It is a no-nonsense guide to critical thinking during the early Middle Ages. Merely reading its 158 theological questions would have been an education in itself for twelfth century university students, as within just a few minutes they would have discovered the kinds of questions that were routinely studied during that time.

If they had been fortunate (that is, rich) enough to own a copy of this book before the age of printing, they could have chosen any question that interested them about God and Christianity, and found both pro and con arguments by authorities, that would at first glance have seemed equally convincing. What they wouldn't have found, however, was a resolution of those questions, for that was the point of this groundbreaking, epochmaking, astonishing book. Students had to work their way through both sets of persuasive arguments to determine for themselves which arguments made the stronger case!

This personal challenge to each student caused a sensation in the medieval university world, which had always appealed to respected authorities and their proof texts to answer such questions. But here students were confronted with two sets of authorities that contradicted one another (hence the book's title: Yes and No).

This story is from the June/July 2024 edition of Philosophy Now.

Start your 7-day Magzter GOLD free trial to access thousands of curated premium stories, and 9,000+ magazines and newspapers.

This story is from the June/July 2024 edition of Philosophy Now.

Start your 7-day Magzter GOLD free trial to access thousands of curated premium stories, and 9,000+ magazines and newspapers.

MORE STORIES FROM PHILOSOPHY NOWView All