Try GOLD - Free
Overwhelming Evil
Philosophy Now
|August/September 2023
Christopher Devlin Brown argues that our wholesale destruction of animals makes veganism humanity’s primary moral imperative.
Imagine you’re looking through a pair of binoculars at a park. At one end of the park you see a young person scribbling some obscene graffiti, while at the other end you recognize a serial killer from the news who seems to be creeping up on a fresh victim. Urgently, you grab a phone and call the police. First, you tell them about the youth who is scribbling graffiti, including their physical description, their location, and other information relevant to catching them. You make sure to be as thorough as possible, then ask the police to read their notes back to you to guarantee that they have correctly transcribed every detail. After all of this information has been properly checked, you then tell them that there is also a serial killer at the other end of the park, and provide them with the information relevant to catching the killer.
Have you done something wrong in this situation?
I believe so. There is a moral obligation to address significantly greater evils before addressing lesser evils, and the obligation becomes more pronounced as the relative difference between the evils increases. For instance, instead of a single serial killer, suppose you see a gang of psychopaths murdering dozens of schoolchildren at one end of the park, and again the graffiti artist at the other end. Trying to stop the graffiti artist before trying to stop the gang of murderers would seem a serious moral error.
This story is from the August/September 2023 edition of Philosophy Now.
Subscribe to Magzter GOLD to access thousands of curated premium stories, and 10,000+ magazines and newspapers.
Already a subscriber? Sign In
MORE STORIES FROM Philosophy Now
Philosophy Now
Nosferatu
Stefan Bolea considers two very different artistic approaches to love and death.
6 mins
April/May 2025
Philosophy Now
Heidegger's Ghost
Raymond Tallis wonders where Heidegger's body went when he was philosophising.
7 mins
April/May 2025
Philosophy Now
Is Comedy Good For Us?
Damaris Stock has a laugh with Plato and friends.
10 mins
April/May 2025
Philosophy Now
In Defense of Idleness
Wendell O'Brien says, 'Just Don't Do It'.
10 mins
April/May 2025
Philosophy Now
Leaving Nothing to Chance by Carl Knight
LEAVING NOTHING TO Chance (2025) by Carl Knight, is an informed, proficient and lucid defence of luck egalitarianism.
3 mins
April/May 2025
Philosophy Now
Star Maker by Olaf Stapledon
THE 1937 SCIENCE FICTION novel Star Maker was written by philosophy professor Olaf Stapledon in the dark days as Europe awaited the onslaught of Nazi Germany. This casts a shadow over the whole book.
6 mins
April/May 2025
Philosophy Now
Love & Emptiness in the Sufi Tradition
Medha Ninad Tambe meditates on Rumi, love and self-negation.
7 mins
April/May 2025
Philosophy Now
The Hedgehog's Dilemma: A Metaphor About the Challenges of Human Intimacy
Krishna Chaubey explains Arthur Schopenhauer's poignant thought experiment.
4 mins
April/May 2025
Philosophy Now
The Mirror & the Flame
Rebwar Fatah imagines Attar's & Hegel's shared path.
4 mins
April/May 2025
Philosophy Now
Free and Equal by Daniel Chandler
DANIEL CHANDLER, AN economist and philosopher based at the London School of Economics, begins Free and Equal: What Would a Fair Society Look Like? (2023) by asking an intriguing question. How is it, he wonders, that the most influential political philosopher of the last century has had almost no practical impact on politics or policy? The philosopher in question is John Rawls, whose magnum opus was A Theory of Justice (1971).
5 mins
April/May 2025
Translate
Change font size

