The court in the case observed and has rejected the argument that the lis pendens doctrine would not apply when the petition was lying in the Registry in a defective state.
The bench comprising of Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, Justice JB Pardiwala and Justice Manoj Misra was hearing the present matter.
The bench in the case was reviewing and recalling a 2022 judgment, wherein the court refused to allow the specific performance of an agreement to sell.
The issue arose of lis pendens when the property was sold after the 2022 judgment.
On the other hand, the respondent argued before the court that the property was sold before the review petition was registered.
On September 23, 2022, the petitioner filed a review petition against the judgment of this Court dated August 25, 2022 within the period of limitation.
On October 14, 2024, the Registry sent a letter to the petitioner asking him to cure defects.
On November 11, 2022, the petitioner cured the defects.
On December 13, 2022, the review petition was registered.
This story is from the November 18, 2024 edition of The Business Guardian.
Start your 7-day Magzter GOLD free trial to access thousands of curated premium stories, and 9,000+ magazines and newspapers.
Already a subscriber ? Sign In
This story is from the November 18, 2024 edition of The Business Guardian.
Start your 7-day Magzter GOLD free trial to access thousands of curated premium stories, and 9,000+ magazines and newspapers.
Already a subscriber? Sign In
Fitness Influencers Rohit Dalal, Akshay Dilawari Join AAP
Fitness influencers, Rohit Dalal and Akshay Dilawari, known for their work in the sports and fitness industry, joined the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) on Thursday.
AAP Keeps Giving Strange Statements to Be in News: BJP
After the Aam Admi Party (AAP) accused Congress of \"speaking the BJP language\", Bharatiya Janata Party MP Sudhanshu Trivedi on Thursday took a dig at the AAP, saying that they make such strange statements to remain in the news, adding that their statement is an admission of their defeat in the Delhi elections.
Cong Accuses Kejriwal of Shifting Blame as AAP's Credibility Collapses
The Delhi unit of Congress claims that the fear of losing the upcoming assembly elections is now haunting Arvind Kejriwal.
NDMC Passes Resolution Condemning Delhi Govt's Schemes
The New Delhi Municipal Corporation (NDMC) on Thursday passed a resolution condemning the AAP-led Delhi government's 'Mukhya Mantri Mahila Samman Yojna' and 'Sanjeevani Yojna'.
Sandeep Dikshit complains to LG against AAP's 'Mahila Samman' scheme
Congress's complaint comes a day after a couple of departments under the Delhi government clarified there is no such scheme and distanced themselves from AAP's promises.
CASH FOR VOTES: AAP MOVES TO ED
Sanjay Singh lodged a complaint with ED against Parvesh Verma, Manjinder Singh Sirsa for allegedly distributing cash to voters.
Kerala High Court: Quashing Of Serious Offence To Efface Evidence Already Recorded Cannot Be Done Even At Instance Of Survivor [POSCO Act]
The Kerala High Court in the case xxx v State and Another observed and has dismissed the petition filed by a victim of POCSO offence to quash the proceedings saying that serious offences are involved and the trial had reached at the end stage.
Punjab And Haryana High Court: POSCO Act Being Enacted Subsequently Will Prevail Over SC/ST Act In
Adding to it, the court stated that when there being a conflict between the provisions of two special enactments, it is trite that the provisions of the latter of the two enactments will prevail and since the POCSO Act is a subsequent enactment, therefore, its provisions will prevail over the SC/ST Act.
Madras High Court Grants Interim Bail To Temple Activist, Asks Him To Refrain From Making Objectionable Comments Against Women
The Madras High Court in the case Rangarajan Narasimhan v State of Tamil Nadu observed and has granted bail to temple activist Rangarajan Narasimham for allegedly making derogatory comments against a woman on social media.
Orissa High Court: Dispute Related To Infringement Of Copyright Is Arbitrable, Arbitrator Can Be Appointed Under Section 11 Of Arbitration Act
The Other party opposed the application which being on the ground that the dispute as evident from the petitioner's notice seeking the appointment of an Arbitrator regards to infringement of copyright which is non-arbitrable.