INTRODUCTION
Millions of Syrians had been displaced, with about 5.5 million in neighboring countries while most of those involved in the initial anti-Assad protests were either dead, in jail or in exile. But, in spite of all this, the feeling was that President Basher Al Assad was there to stay.
For more than half a century, the Assad dynasty appeared to have an impregnable hold over Syria. Relying on a formidable security apparatus, repressive use of force, and powerful allies like Russia, Iran, and Hezbollah. It had withstood multiple uprisings, and the regime had lost control of parts of the country in the civil war. But in recent years, Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, whose government had been sanctioned and sidelined from regional and international forums since 2011, had regained some of his standing, as the Arab League reinstated Syria and there was talk of sanctions relief.
Yet all that changed in a matter of days with a rare momentum of events. It is hard to overstate how incredible the collapse has been, given the history of the war in Syria. The stunning collapse of the 53-year Al-Assad family rule has been described as a historic moment nearly 14 years after Syrians rose in peaceful protests against a government that met them with violence. The situation in Syria has now dramatically shifted, radically altering the prevailing status quo.
THE CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS
On 08 December, the Islamist rebels of the Hayat Tahrir al-Sham, the Syrian Liberation Group, or HTS took control of Damascus while Russia announced that Assad had taken refuge in Moscow. On 09 December, HTS leader Abu Mohammad al-Jolani met with Prime Minister Mohammad Ghazi al-Jalali to "coordinate the transfer of power". The entire affair had taken less than two weeks, with little bloodshed.
This story is from the December 13, 2024 edition of The Business Guardian.
Start your 7-day Magzter GOLD free trial to access thousands of curated premium stories, and 9,000+ magazines and newspapers.
Already a subscriber ? Sign In
This story is from the December 13, 2024 edition of The Business Guardian.
Start your 7-day Magzter GOLD free trial to access thousands of curated premium stories, and 9,000+ magazines and newspapers.
Already a subscriber? Sign In
Cong, BJP issue three-line whip to LS MPs for Constitution debate
The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the Congress party have issued a \"three-line whip\" notice for all its Lok Sabha members of parliament (MPs), to be present in the lower house on December 13 and 14 during the scheduled debate on the Constitution of India.
Yamuna Authority is flouting the Land Acquisition Act made in 2013: Sudhir Tyagi
Farmers from 16 villages who lost the case in the Supreme Court addressed the media under the banner of Kisan Kalyan Parishad at the Press Club of India in the capital Delhi.
Refrain from making personal remarks: Birla to MPs
Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla on Thursday condemned the controversial comments made by TMC leader Kalyan Banerjee about Telecom Minister Jyotiraditya Scindia and requested the members to refrain from personal comments on any caste, society, women, or men in their speeches.
India's Maritime History Neglected for Decades, IMHC Attempts to Revive Academic Focus: "Sarbananda Sonowal"
The two-day-long India Maritime Heritage Conclave (IMHC) drew a successful closure as the maiden conclave attempt to revive academic focus on India's maritime history.
LoP in Rajya Sabha not allowed to speak: Ramesh
Congress MP Jairam Ramesh on Thursday launched a scathing attack on the Rajya Sabha Chairman, accusing him of biased conduct and undermining the opposition in the upper house of Parliament.
Rajya Sabha adjourned amid ruckus
Amid ruckus in the House, Rajya Sabha was adjourned on Thursday till 11 am on December 13.
DUBEY RAISES 'SONIA-SOROS' LINK IN LS
BJP leader Nishikant Dubey on Thursday targeted the Congress on George Soros controversy amidst the din in the Lok Sabha.
Supreme Court to hear plea by CCI seeking to transfer Amazon, Flipkart cases
The bench headed by CJI Sanjiv Khanna reverted wherein stating that he has already listed the matter for hearing. 'I have already marked the matter, please check-up the list, we have already done that'
Supreme Court: Permanent alimony should not penalise husband but should ensure decent living for wife
The Supreme Court in the case Parvin Kumar Jain Versus Anju Jain observed and has directed the husband to grant permanent alimony of Rs. 5 Crores to the wife as a one-time settlement upon dissolution of the marriage.
Supreme Court reserves judgement on plea filed by transwoman alleging discrimination in employment due to gender identity
The bench in the case issued a notice on January 2. The court also asked the parties for filing written submissions within the period of 2 weeks.