3 Versus 2: Egalitarianism Vs Inequality?
The Times of India Hyderabad|November 08, 2022
Excluding poor from reserved classes discriminatory: Minority judgment
AmitAanand Choudhary 
3 Versus 2: Egalitarianism Vs Inequality?

New Delhi: In their minority verdict, Chief Justice U U Lalit and Justice Ravindra Bhat held that the 103rd constitutional amendment was discriminatory in not allowing the poor from the reserved classes to get the benefits of reservation while giving benefits to only general classes and cited official data which showed that more than 80% of the Below Poverty Line (BPL) families belonged to SCs/STs/OBCs.

“The exclusionary clause (in the impugned amendment) that keeps out from the benefits of economic reservation, backward classes and SC/STs, therefore, strikes a death knell to the equality and fraternal principle which permeates the equality code and non-discrimination principle,” said Justice Bhat, who penned the judgment for himself and the CJI.

This story is from the November 08, 2022 edition of The Times of India Hyderabad.

Start your 7-day Magzter GOLD free trial to access thousands of curated premium stories, and 9,000+ magazines and newspapers.

This story is from the November 08, 2022 edition of The Times of India Hyderabad.

Start your 7-day Magzter GOLD free trial to access thousands of curated premium stories, and 9,000+ magazines and newspapers.