Seoul Searching

The court's main task would be to determine whether Yoon's martial law declaration constitutes an impeachable offense and if it meets the threshold for insurrection. Under Article 65 (1) of the South Korean Constitution, two criteria must be met for presidential impeachment. The actions by the President must relate to his/her official duties. They must also be unconstitutional. This eliminates personal or partisan matters as grounds for impeachment

In South Korea, the law has not spared any person, not even the President, if they are found to be engaged in wrongdoing and illegal activities. Yoon Suk-yeol is the third South Korean president impeached while in office. In 2016, parliament impeached Park Geun-hye, the country's first female president, over a corruption scandal. The Constitutional Court upheld her impeachment and dismissed her from office.

In 2004, President Roh Moo-hyun was impeached in parliament over an alleged election law violation but the court later overturned his impeachment and restored his presidential powers. But the dramatic development of December 2024 has scarred South Korea's image as one of East Asia's democratic strongholds.

Many decades ago, the late famous political scientist Robert Scalapino, a much revered scholar on East Asia had written a column wherein he examined the rationale of some of the Asian countries that gained independence after World War II and chose the authoritarian model of governance. Such a choice was acceptable to restore order and carve out a path for rapid economic growth. Examples of South Korea and Taiwan were cited. This was a transition phase which subsequently led to the establishment of democracy.

Unfortunately, South Korea has defied such a model time and again after having accepted the restoration of democracy but having again returned to the authoritarian system of governance. In a column for Japan Forward, Monika Chansoria states that authoritarian regimes in South Korea have declared martial law 15 times since the country's founding in 1948. Though democracy is still seen as a preferred choice, there are certain flaws, which is why the country's presidents have attempted to function under an authoritarian model of governance with varying consequences. The list below is illustrative of the observation.