Immanuel Kant is the grandfather of social constructivism the theory that people construct reality out of a shared human experience. According to Kant, the world we experience of space, time, matter, and causation, is structured by the human mind. His point is not just that our concepts of the world are determined by our mental architecture. Rather, space, time, matter, and causation themselves are mentally structured kinds.
Kant assumes that the structure of rational thought is universal. Hence, we are not each trapped in an individual reality of our individual making, but instead share a common world of experience. Today, sociologists tend to emphasize the variety of human thought that arises from differences in culture, history, or social position. The result is a more fragmented view of human thought than Kant imagined. Where he saw everyone inhabiting a single mentally constructed reality, many today see us as occupying different realities, each dependent on contingent background features. But this does mean that Kant + contingent variability = social constructivism. Hence, he is the grandfather of social constructivism.
Kant deployed his own 'constructivism' to respond to Hume, who argued that the senses can only deliver imperfect information about the view just from your particular perspective and there is no way to push beyond personal experience to knowledge of the universal or general structure of the world. Kant points out that this only follows if we assume that gaining knowledge is a matter of the mind conforming itself to what lies outside of it, and so is separate from it. If, on the other hand, the mind is responsible for the general features of the empirical experience of the world, then we can uncover the large-scale properties of reality from sufficiently critical reflection on the workings of the mind, and in particular, from reason itself.
هذه القصة مأخوذة من طبعة June / July 2022 من Philosophy Now.
ابدأ النسخة التجريبية المجانية من Magzter GOLD لمدة 7 أيام للوصول إلى آلاف القصص المتميزة المنسقة وأكثر من 9,000 مجلة وصحيفة.
بالفعل مشترك ? تسجيل الدخول
هذه القصة مأخوذة من طبعة June / July 2022 من Philosophy Now.
ابدأ النسخة التجريبية المجانية من Magzter GOLD لمدة 7 أيام للوصول إلى آلاف القصص المتميزة المنسقة وأكثر من 9,000 مجلة وصحيفة.
بالفعل مشترك? تسجيل الدخول
The Two Dennises
Hannah Mortimer observes a close encounter of the same kind.
Heraclitus (c.500 BC)
Harry Keith lets flow a stream of ideas about permanence and change.
Does the Cosmos Have a Purpose?
Raymond Tallis argues intently against universal intention.
Is Driving Fossil-Fuelled Cars Immoral?
Rufus Duits asks when we can justify driving our carbon contributors.
Abelard & Carneades Yes & No
Frank Breslin says 'yes and no' to presenting both sides of an argument.
Frankl & Sartre in Search of Meaning
Georgia Arkell compares logotherapy and atheistic existentialism.
Luce Irigaray
Luce Irigaray, now ninety-two years old, was, among many other things, one of the most impactful feminists of the 1970s liberation movements - before she was marginalised, then ostracised, from the francophone intellectual sphere.
Significance
Ruben David Azevedo tells us why, in a limitless universe, we’re not insignificant.
The Present Is Not All There Is To Happiness
Rob Glacier says don’t just live in the now.
Philosophers Exploring The Good Life
Jim Mepham quests with philosophers to discover what makes a life good.