Abelard & Carneades Yes & No
Philosophy Now|June/July 2024
Frank Breslin says 'yes and no' to presenting both sides of an argument.
Frank Breslin
Abelard & Carneades Yes & No

Should you have antiquarian interests, at some point you may want to read the medieval treatise Sic et Non written in 1120 by French theologian Peter Abelard (10791142 CE). It is a no-nonsense guide to critical thinking during the early Middle Ages. Merely reading its 158 theological questions would have been an education in itself for twelfth century university students, as within just a few minutes they would have discovered the kinds of questions that were routinely studied during that time.

If they had been fortunate (that is, rich) enough to own a copy of this book before the age of printing, they could have chosen any question that interested them about God and Christianity, and found both pro and con arguments by authorities, that would at first glance have seemed equally convincing. What they wouldn't have found, however, was a resolution of those questions, for that was the point of this groundbreaking, epochmaking, astonishing book. Students had to work their way through both sets of persuasive arguments to determine for themselves which arguments made the stronger case!

This personal challenge to each student caused a sensation in the medieval university world, which had always appealed to respected authorities and their proof texts to answer such questions. But here students were confronted with two sets of authorities that contradicted one another (hence the book's title: Yes and No).

Diese Geschichte stammt aus der June/July 2024-Ausgabe von Philosophy Now.

Starten Sie Ihre 7-tägige kostenlose Testversion von Magzter GOLD, um auf Tausende kuratierte Premium-Storys sowie über 8.000 Zeitschriften und Zeitungen zuzugreifen.

Diese Geschichte stammt aus der June/July 2024-Ausgabe von Philosophy Now.

Starten Sie Ihre 7-tägige kostenlose Testversion von Magzter GOLD, um auf Tausende kuratierte Premium-Storys sowie über 8.000 Zeitschriften und Zeitungen zuzugreifen.

WEITERE ARTIKEL AUS PHILOSOPHY NOWAlle anzeigen
FALLING DOWN
Philosophy Now

FALLING DOWN

Thomas R. Morgan considers how personal identity is maintained, and how it is lost.

time-read
6 Minuten  |
February/March 2024
Pythagoras (570-495 BCE)
Philosophy Now

Pythagoras (570-495 BCE)

Daniel Toré looks beyond the mathematician to the philosopher.

time-read
10 Minuten  |
February/March 2024
Wordsworth & Darwin
Philosophy Now

Wordsworth & Darwin

Christine Avery wonders whether poetry can help us to deal with science.

time-read
7 Minuten  |
February/March 2024
Plants & Philosophy
Philosophy Now

Plants & Philosophy

Caroline Deforche sees similarities between gardening and philosophising.

time-read
2 Minuten  |
February/March 2024
Dr.Gindi sculptor, has a philosophical conversation with Richard Baron about sensation, life, infinity and, you guessed it, sculpture.
Philosophy Now

Dr.Gindi sculptor, has a philosophical conversation with Richard Baron about sensation, life, infinity and, you guessed it, sculpture.

Dr. Gindi is one of Switzerland's foremost sculptors, whose work has been exhibited in many countries.

time-read
10+ Minuten  |
February/March 2024
Thomas Aquinas on Extraterrestrial Life
Philosophy Now

Thomas Aquinas on Extraterrestrial Life

Babatunde Onabajo tells us why Aquinas did not believe in aliens.

time-read
5 Minuten  |
February/March 2024
The Fire This Time
Philosophy Now

The Fire This Time

Tim Madigan on Ray Bradbury, Bertrand Russell and Fahrenheit 451.

time-read
10 Minuten  |
February/March 2024
Trust, Truth & Political Conversations
Philosophy Now

Trust, Truth & Political Conversations

Adrian Brockless wants a recognition of human value in political debate.

time-read
10+ Minuten  |
February/March 2024
Philosophy & The Crown
Philosophy Now

Philosophy & The Crown

Vincent Di Norcia on monarchy and stability.

time-read
4 Minuten  |
February/March 2024
Technologists & Ethicists
Philosophy Now

Technologists & Ethicists

Stephen L. Anderson laments inadequate moral insight among tech leaders.

time-read
10+ Minuten  |
February/March 2024