
I'm an environmentalist, which means I've got some practice in saying no. It's what we do: John Muir saying no to the destruction of Yosemite helped kick off environmentalism; Rachel Carson said no to DDT; the Sierra Club said no to the damming of the Grand Canyon. We're often quite good at it, and thank heaven; I'll go to my grave satisfied by, if nothing else, having played some part in stopping Big Oil from building the Keystone XL pipeline 1,700 miles across the heart of the continent. Right now I'm deeply engaged with American colleagues in trying to stop our big banks from funding fossil fuel expansion, and rooting on friends in Africa as they battle the giant EACOP pipeline, and watching with admiration as European confreres fight plans to expand coal mines at the expense of forests and villages. In a world where giant corporations, and the governments they too often control, ceaselessly do dangerous and unnecessary things, saying no is a valuable survival skill for civilizations.
But we're at a hinge moment now, when solving our biggest problems-environmental but also social means we need to say yes to some things: solar panels and wind turbines and factories to make batteries and mines to extract lithium. And new affordable housing that will make cities denser and more efficient while cutting the ruinous price of housing. Andwell, it's a long list. And in every case there are both benefits and costs, all played out in particular places with particular histories. But what interests me is the search for some general principles that might make these disputes easier, at least for people of goodwill. I'm thinking of people like me: older white people, a class particularly used to working the system, and perhaps psychologically tilted toward keeping things the way they are.
Is there some way to calculate when the balance tips one way or the other? Some way to figure out when we should protest change and when we should just be quiet?
This story is from the May/June 2023 edition of Mother Jones.
Start your 7-day Magzter GOLD free trial to access thousands of curated premium stories, and 9,000+ magazines and newspapers.
Already a subscriber ? Sign In
This story is from the May/June 2023 edition of Mother Jones.
Start your 7-day Magzter GOLD free trial to access thousands of curated premium stories, and 9,000+ magazines and newspapers.
Already a subscriber? Sign In

LOSING THE FARM
How RFK Jr's healthy-foods movement swallowed up some of the Democratic base

The Unflinching Courage of Taylor Cadle
The police said she lied about being raped. Then she hit record.

VIRTUOUS CYCLE
The big money push to tell women to bring back \"natural\" birth control

POWER OF THE PURSE
There's never been an administration this rich. History says it won't end well.

ENTITLEMENTS
Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy's DOGE reboots austerity for the era of Big Tech.

POET OF THE PEOPLE
aja monet is reviving the Black Arts Movement's tradition of pairing poetry with live music-and drawing Gen Z to her shows.

THE HIT LIST
Trump wants to remake America. These are the people who will suffer.

PRISON BREAK
There are many programs trying to reduce recidivism. This one works.

THE PLOT AGAINST BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP
It's time to take the rhetoric about \"anchor babies\" seriously.

CIVIL WAR
The legal industry's monopoly on advice ensures only the rich can afford a lawyer. Now, an unlikely coalition is fighting to change that-—and it might just succeed.