In a continuation, the series looks at key regulators that grant access and continuity to higher education institutions in India
Background
We have, in an earlier edition, looked at some noteworthy considerations when one is interested in establishing a K-21 school. In the current piece, we speak about the key regulators who grant access and continuity to the higher education institutions in the country. But owing to a series of significant developments in the legal regime in the sector, we also look into the consequent changes that are coming about.
Setting up an Institution of Higher Education
Higher education in the Indian context implies the stages of education that a candidate/student would undergo after successfully completing his K-12 education, i.e., school. Depending on the stream and level of education, there is a multitude of regulators that could have jurisdiction over an educational institution. The key regulators, however, continue to be the University Grants Commission (“UGC”) and the All India Council for Technical Education (“AICTE”). There are other regulators as well for specialized education, like the Bar Council of India and the Medical Council of India.
For the purposes of this article, we will exclude institutes of vocational training. Although the AICTE has a role to play in this as well, vocational training is substantially governed by a separate regulator, being the National Council on Vocational Training.
The AICTE
Esta historia es de la edición December 2017 de Legal Era.
Comience su prueba gratuita de Magzter GOLD de 7 días para acceder a miles de historias premium seleccionadas y a más de 9,000 revistas y periódicos.
Ya eres suscriptor ? Conectar
Esta historia es de la edición December 2017 de Legal Era.
Comience su prueba gratuita de Magzter GOLD de 7 días para acceder a miles de historias premium seleccionadas y a más de 9,000 revistas y periódicos.
Ya eres suscriptor? Conectar
If You Think Positive Covid Is A Big Opportunity
Senior Vice President and Head of Legal, ESSAR CAPITAL, Badrinath Durvasula, holds forth on his professional journey, the essence of leadership, working from home, books and more…
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT
JOINT VENTURE TRANSACTIONS
NEW ARBITRATION RULES
PUBLISHED BY THE LONDON COURT OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION (LCIA) AND INTERNATIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE (ICC)
M&A in the time of COVID and beyond
What is clear for those engaging in cross-border M&A is that countries around the world are becoming increasingly protective of their economies and industries, with new rules being introduced and existing rules being more widely applied
SWITZERLAND A DIFFERENTIATED APPROACH TO FRAUD
Swiss law interprets the offense of fraud in a special way where in addition to the characteristics of deception and damage as known in many jurisdictions, a qualified lie, i.e. a malicious approach, is required
JOINT VENTURE DISPUTES MEDIATING
Mediation has shown itself to be a powerful tool for bringing a speedy and effective end to crossborder disputes while preserving the commercial relationship between them.
Recognition of HONG KONG INSOLVENCY PROCEEDINGS IN MAINLAND CHINA
A TEST CASE IN THE MAKING?
CONFIDENTIALITY IN ARBITRATION: RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN SINGAPORE
Two recent developments in Singapore case law and legislation reflect a willingness to preserve confidentiality related obligations in all arbitrations
ESSENTIAL GOODS SERVICES UNDER IBC
WHAT DOES IT ESSENTIALLY MEAN?
A BIDEN ADMINISTRATION'S NEW VISION FOR THE AMERICAN WORKPLACE
A LOOK AT THE KEY CHANGES PRESIDENT-ELECT BIDEN IS LIKELY TO MAKE ONCE HE TAKES OFFICE