How often have you read or heard someone say something like “That’s not possible, it couldn’t have happened like that”? That person may think it’s a clever rebuttal which stops debate in its tracks and gives them the rhetorical victory, but it’s a fallacy in informal logic known as the argument from personal incredulity.
Humans have a need for certainty – we have a psychological preference against doubt – which is why this fallacy has a particular allure. To understand what’s going on when someone has committed this fallacy, we can unpack its unstated logic:
1. I can’t imagine how this thing could be true
2. But if this thing is true then I should be able to imagine how it’s true
3. Therefore this thing is not true
Once the premises of the argument, 1 and 2, are laid bare, its flaw is exposed. The premise that ‘If this thing is true then I should be able to imagine how it’s true’ is evidently false, or at least, is not necessarily true.
Esta historia es de la edición February/March 2021 de Philosophy Now.
Comience su prueba gratuita de Magzter GOLD de 7 días para acceder a miles de historias premium seleccionadas y a más de 9,000 revistas y periódicos.
Ya eres suscriptor ? Conectar
Esta historia es de la edición February/March 2021 de Philosophy Now.
Comience su prueba gratuita de Magzter GOLD de 7 días para acceder a miles de historias premium seleccionadas y a más de 9,000 revistas y periódicos.
Ya eres suscriptor? Conectar
Anselm (1033-1109)
Martin Jenkins recalls the being of the creator of the ontological argument.
Is Brillo Box an Illustration?
Thomas E. Wartenberg uses Warhol's work to illustrate his theory of illustration.
Why is Freedom So Important To Us?
John Shand explains why free will is basic to humanity.
The Funnel of Righteousness
Peter Worley tells us how to be right, righter, rightest.
We're as Smart as the Universe Gets
James Miles argues, among other things, that E.T. will be like Kim Kardashian, and that the real threat of advanced AI has been misunderstood.
Managing the Mind
Roger Haines contemplates how we consciously manage our minds.
lain McGilchrist's Naturalized Metaphysics
Rogério Severo looks at the brain to see the world anew.
Love & Metaphysics
Peter Graarup Westergaard explains why love is never just physical, with the aid of Donald Davidson's anomalous monism.
Mary Leaves Her Room
Nigel Hems asks, does Mary see colours differently outside her room?
From Birds To Brains
Jonathan Moens considers whether emergence can explain minds from brains.