TryGOLD- Free

Criticising Strawson's Compatibilism

Philosophy Now|December 2023 / January 2024
Nurana Rajabova is wary of an attempt to dismiss determinism to keep free will.
- Nurana Rajabova
Criticising Strawson's Compatibilism

The belief that human beings have moral responsibility is used to judge people based on their actions, then to reward or punish them accordingly. But is this just? This question becomes unavoidable when the theory of determinism enters the discussion. Determinists claim that every event or occurrence in the world, including human desires, thoughts, and acts, are predetermined by physical laws of cause and effect. In such a world there is no space for free will, since any person’s action at any time could not have been different, if all the physical conditions causing it remain the same. As there is no human free will, say the determinists, there can be no moral responsibility either. At the other end of the axis stand libertarians who also view the two phenomena as incompatible, yet the theory they reject is determinism, as they believe that humans do possess free will. Therefore, assigning moral responsibility is justifiable according to their view. In-between these two positions are the compatibilists, who claim that determinism and moral responsibility are not mutually exclusive after all. Different compatibilists explain this with different arguments. In this article, I will only examine one such argument, made by Peter Strawson in his seminal paper ‘Freedom and Resentment’ (Proceedings of the British Academy, Volume 48, 1962), with the purpose of seeing whether it does resolve the centuries old puzzle.

Strawson’s Argument

This story is from the {{IssueName}} edition of {{MagazineName}}.

Start your 7-day Magzter GOLD free trial to access thousands of curated premium stories, and 9,500+ magazines and newspapers.

This story is from the {{IssueName}} edition of {{MagazineName}}.

Start your 7-day Magzter GOLD free trial to access thousands of curated premium stories, and 9,500+ magazines and newspapers.

MORE STORIES FROM PHILOSOPHY NOWView all
Affirmative Action for Androids
Philosophy Now

Affirmative Action for Androids

Jimmy Alfonso Licon asks, when should we prioritise android rights?

time-read
10+ mins  |
June/July 2025
Welcome to the Civilization of the Liar's Paradox
Philosophy Now

Welcome to the Civilization of the Liar's Paradox

Slavoj Žižek uncovers political paradoxes of lying.

time-read
10+ mins  |
June/July 2025
The Importance of the Purple
Philosophy Now

The Importance of the Purple

Massimo Pigliucci looks for threads of integrity in a morally compromised world.

time-read
3 mins  |
June/July 2025
Ethics for the Age of AI
Philosophy Now

Ethics for the Age of AI

Mahmoud Khatami asks, can machines make good moral decisions?

time-read
10 mins  |
June/July 2025
Anand Vaidya (1976-2024)
Philosophy Now

Anand Vaidya (1976-2024)

Manjula Menon on the short but full career of a 'disciplinary trespasser'.

time-read
7 mins  |
June/July 2025
Studying Smarter with AI?
Philosophy Now

Studying Smarter with AI?

Max Gottschlich on sense and nonsense when using AI in academia.

time-read
5 mins  |
June/July 2025
Excusing God
Philosophy Now

Excusing God

Raymond Tallis highlights the problem of evil.

time-read
7 mins  |
June/July 2025
Stephen Fry
Philosophy Now

Stephen Fry

Perhaps unshockingly for someone who is an actor, broadcaster, comedian, director, narrator and writer, Stephen Fry has a deep interest in words and how we use them. After hearing him lecture on that subject, Marcel Steinbauer-Lewis asked him about Artificial Intelligence and how it connects with the extraordinary lure of language.

time-read
8 mins  |
June/July 2025
Is VR Meaningful Escapism?
Philosophy Now

Is VR Meaningful Escapism?

Amir Haj-Bolouri enquires into possible meaning through technology.

time-read
9 mins  |
June/July 2025
What Simone de Beauvoir Got — And Didn't Get – About Motherhood
Philosophy Now

What Simone de Beauvoir Got — And Didn't Get – About Motherhood

Nura Hossainzadeh argues that motherhood is both physical and transcendent.

time-read
10+ mins  |
June/July 2025

We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to cookies. Learn more