PRINCE Harry's pal James Haskell has backed the royals but dubbed them "very dysfunctional".
The former England rugby union star, 39, said they were an incredible family but that "some aren't as great as others".
Haskell is known to be friendly with the Duke of Sussex, having attended his wedding to Meghan Markle in 2018.
He went to the ceremony at Windsor Castle with TV host wife Chloe Madeley, before they split in October 2023.
Haskell, now an international DJ, said the country should get behind the Royal Family for the work they do.
This story is from the {{IssueName}} edition of {{MagazineName}}.
Start your 7-day Magzter GOLD free trial to access thousands of curated premium stories, and 9,000+ magazines and newspapers.
Already a subscriber ? Sign In
This story is from the {{IssueName}} edition of {{MagazineName}}.
Start your 7-day Magzter GOLD free trial to access thousands of curated premium stories, and 9,000+ magazines and newspapers.
Already a subscriber? Sign In
Bringing back the BGT.buzz...
YouTuber KSI on standing in for Bruno at auditions
When friends and family found out I was the new Bergerac, they all wanted to know about the car!
Damien Molony on stepping into shoes of iconic TV sleuth
LOCAL ACCENTS 'ARE DYING OUT'
REGIONAL accents are under threat as people continue to move around the country, an expert says.
Mad for Mikey
Meet the 25-year-old former horse-riding obsessive who beat Hollywood megastar Demi to the coveted Best Actress Bafta
The councillor 'who tried to blow up a cat'
First sighting of accused since garden blast
Our love prayers are with your boys
Shock and sadness at Valentine's shooting of much-loved mum Lisa
Fears as Pope faces 'complex clinical situation'
88-year-old in hospital with respiratory infection
'You show the world how to move forward"
Harry honours Canada's First Nations at tearful closing of Invictus Games
WE'RE GOING TO WIN
1943 letter reveals PM Churchill knew the tide was turning against the Nazis
Brit 'left alone to die in Vegas hotel'
Wife of diabetic sues casino for negligence
